--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über SkillPanel zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SkillPanel Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Einstellungstest Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [SkillPanel](/software/147881/devskiller) # SkillPanel Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/147881/devskiller Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/147881/devskiller?page=2) > Devskiller ist eine Plattform zum Entwickler-Screening und Online-Interviews, die auf der RealLifeTesting-Methode basiert. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 54 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet SkillPanel? IT-Unternehmen und Unternehmen mit IT-Abteilung zum Testen von Entwicklern im Rekrutierungsprozess, Kodierungsschulen und IT-Dozenten für Bildungs-, Bewertungs- und Zertifizierungszwecke ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 54 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: DevSkiller - **Gegründet**: 2013 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 209 weitere ## Funktionen - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Teste - Automatische Einstufung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Beurteilung der Kompetenzen - Beurteilung-Management - Bewerber-Management - Bewerber-Tracking - Daten-Import / -Export - Einstellungen (Personalbeschaffung) - Einstellungstests - Fragenkatalog - Individualisierte Beurteilung - Kandidatenvergleich - Leistungsmanagement - Online-Tests - Test-/Quizerstellung - Tests/Bewertungen - Umfragen & Feedback - Vorgefertigte Testbibliothek - Vorlagen - Wertung ## Integrationen (7 insgesamt) - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Lever - SmartRecruiters - Teamtailor - Tellent Recruitee - Workable ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Einstellungstest Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Einstellungstest Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Talent Management Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10029/talent-management/software) - [Recruitment Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Manatal](https://www.capterra.ch/software/181145/manatal) — 4.6/5 (141 reviews) 2. [Criteria](https://www.capterra.ch/software/119740/criteria) — 4.7/5 (188 reviews) 3. [Talview](https://www.capterra.ch/software/142374/talview) — 4.2/5 (42 reviews) 4. [TestGorilla](https://www.capterra.ch/software/203823/testgorilla) — 4.1/5 (265 reviews) 5. [Paycor](https://www.capterra.ch/software/133745/paycor-perform) — 4.3/5 (3033 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Good site for testing candidates" — 4.0/5 > **Gert Jan** | *14. September 2018* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The possibility to define your own tasks and tests. There are a lot of different types of questions and different platforms that are supported. > > **Nachteile**: To make your own programming tasks you have to upload a zip-file with a project. If something is wrong, you don't get very clear error messages. > > We use Devskiller to test candidates that apply for a job. It helps us to check whether they have the knowledge they need for their job. ----- ### "Pre-screen candidates with relevant questions" — 5.0/5 > **Bryan** | *20. April 2018* | Kunst & Handwerk | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Out of the box, we're supplied with relevant questions and programming solutions we can customize a test with. It didn't take long at all for us to get a list of questions the team liked together in a test, and start testing candidates in our funnel. There's a large pool of format of questions- we don't need to format the coding questions into weird multiple choice questions where you select the correct code as other platforms have you do. Along the same vein, we can have the candidate complete coding projects that are similar to work our developers do each day: find and fix the existing bug(s), implement a new feature, or perform a code review (similar to Bitbucket or Github pull request code reviews). We ended up writing a few of our own questions, which wasn't difficult, that allowed us to test candidates how they'd perform against some of our own code. The code reviews especially have been great at determining the candidate's skill level based on the feedback they give. Being able to have the candidate download/upload code from Devskiller so they can modify it in their own IDE, or allowing them to grab the code from a temporary Github repository is a big plus. > > **Nachteile**: Some bugs had come up, such as not being able to turn on/off an option in a test question. These were resolved quickly in a few hours after sending an email to the support email. The test isn't fully automated for some types of questions (as you would expect for code reviews), but there's also not a way to give automatic partial credit on multiple-choice questions. This requires us to go through the test questions individually to give partial credit (4 / 5 correct doesn't seem like a 0% to us), but the time isn't significant. Brackets seem to break the SQL questions, which is odd and hangs some candidates up. > > We've cut down the amount of in-person interviews we need to hold by 65+% by being able to realize what the level of experience the candidate demonstrates within code very similar to our own. When we do bring in a candidate, we have a good baseline idea of where their skillset it at, and can tailor the in-person interview to allow us to determine the candidate's rate-of-growth and dive deeper into what they know. ----- ### "review" — 4.0/5 > **Anna** | *17. Mai 2023* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: skill map is a very useful tool to present the skills across the organisation > > **Nachteile**: skillsets are a rather difficult concept and sometimes it is difficult to operate using them > > positive but demanding ----- ### "Hiring candidates with devskiller" — 5.0/5 > **Francois** | *12. Juni 2023* | Elektrische/elektronische Fertigung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The flexibility of the type of test, the in-browser developer experience, the number of pre-defined test that gets updated all the time makes devSkiller the best way for us to best assess and improve candidate in our projects. > > **Nachteile**: The candidature management is hard when dealing with a large among of candidates. note taking, grouping could be a nice add-on. > > As soon as we got devSkiller in our hiring process, we saw a direct improvement of our developer and code quality in our project. It helped us better target our candidates and skills we needed and gain a huge among of time in the hiring process. ----- ### "My experience with Devskiller" — 4.0/5 > **Agata** | *9. Mai 2023* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy of use, graphical representation of skills-skill map, analytics tab- ability to generate reports, ability to integrate with other applications in the company, good cooperation with Devskiller. > > **Nachteile**: Unintuitive place where tutorials are placed in the tool. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/147881/devskiller?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/147881/devskiller) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten