--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über zipBoard zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: zipBoard Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Bugtracker](/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) > [zipBoard](/software/150774/zipboard) # zipBoard Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/150774/zipboard Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/150774/zipboard?page=2) > Feedback-Zusammenarbeit mit integrierter Bug-Nachverfolgung für Websites, E-Learning-Kurse, Webanwendungen, Videos und Bilder. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 92 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet zipBoard? ZipBoard ist geeignet für: 1. Teams, die Feedback von externen Stakeholdern wie Kunden und KMU benötigen, für Websites, E-Learning und Videos 2. Agenturen, die Web-Projekte und E-Learning-Angebote erstellen 3. Teams, die Web-Anwendungen erstellen ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 92 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: zipBoard - **Region**: Vancouver, Kanada - **Gegründet**: 2016 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 99.00 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Frankreich, Indien, Irland, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Mexiko, Niederlande, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - @mentions - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Audit Trail - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Content-Management - Dokumentenmanagement - Dokumentenprüfung - Dokumentenspeicher - Filesharing - Kommentare / Notizen - Kontrolle des Genehmigungsprozesses - Kundenspezifisches Branding - Problem-Nachverfolgung - Projektmanagement - Suchen / filtern - Third-Party Integrations - Ticket-Management - Versionskontrolle - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Management - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (4 insgesamt) - Jira - Slack - Wrike - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Online-Proofing-Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31521/online-proofing/software) - [Content Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32935/content-collaboration/software) - [Creative Management Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31340/creative-management/software) - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Alternativen 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.ch/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5726 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.ch/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 3. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.ch/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4561 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.ch/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13547 reviews) 5. [Slack](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24046 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Good tool for bug tracking" — 5.0/5 > **Deeksha** | *25. November 2020* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The user interface and ease of use. We can also switch between table and Kanban view. > > **Nachteile**: There is nothing to dislike. It solves the purpose like a charm. ----- ### "Incredibly effective platform for communicating with clients on web development" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *13. Juni 2019* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: \*Ease of use: clients who self-identify as "not a computer whiz" had no trouble using the platform and features. \*Ability for client to view a webpage, click somewhere on it, make a comment about that area, and move on...all while tasks get created and organized in a "to do" list gets generated in the background...makes client feedback a BREEZE. \*Effective tracking: even if the client isn't labeling comments, tasks, requests, etc "properly", it's very easy to follow activity and make sure nothing gets lost or forgotten \*Pricing is appropriate and worth it \*It does everything I needed for a remote website development project: get client feedback, revise, and complete with no crossed wires or forgotten/lost requests. And no misunderstandings or miscommunications - the record is right there\! Total project management solution. > > **Nachteile**: When the "collaborator" (ability to add a "client" is an enterprise only, custom price point) provides feedback, the task status isn't automatically changed from "waiting on client feedback" - so the "collaborator" (ie, my client) has to manually change the status to something else - otherwise the task, although provided with feedback, remains in the "I'm waiting on you" stage. The method for changing the status is simple - but clients don't need to be bothered with the multi-step process of making sure to adjust "tags". Having said that, the way to go about making sure that the client has in fact provided feedback (despite the unchanged "status") is to simply sort tasks by activity. Which is where we arrive at the main issue I have: At the time of this writing, you could sort tasks by date that a task was modified - but you can't add a secondary filter (ie: "modified BY"). Which means that while a client may have provided feedback and forgotten to change the status, I'm simultaneously modifying or adjusting other tasks.... hence I'm not quickly and easily able to filter the list for tasks that the client has recently modified. It's not the end of the world - it just created a bit of extra work having to go through the "Recently modified" tasks one-by-one to make sure that I hadn't missed anything. Yes, I can go through the list of "waiting on client" ....but completed tasks, where client changed their mind \& added a revision w/o changing status away from "completed"..... > > Love it. Small hiccups here and there but excellent product and does what I need it to do. ----- ### "Great platform, would love to see some of the functionality expanded." — 3.0/5 > **Justine** | *14. Juni 2019* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Screenshot functionality with comments shown on page, ability to post comments within a stream although these can be difficult to read. If status changes were a different colour that would help. > > **Nachteile**: Can be a clunky user experience, especially from a client perspective, so it can be hard to collaborate within this platform. They tend to resort to emailing their feedback instead of creating tasks. Do you have any basic user guides for logging in, accessing the website review page, creating tasks and tagging users or reassigning? > > I previously used Airtable for tracking web change requests, and I loved the functionality of this platform however it could be hard for clients to utilise without seeing the comments in the context of the website. Some suggestions: - Allow drag \& drop sorting of tasks - Allow task list to remember your sort order from last time instead of defaulting to post date, eg. I don't have to select to sort by 'Screen' each time I reload the page. - Allow screenshot option that captures the entire page - eg. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/full-page-screen-capture/fdpohaocaechififmbbbbbknoalclacl That way, I could add all of my feedback comments within one screen, and when sorting or filtering tasks we can focus on feedback for one particular page. - If you could rename screens within the individual task window, that would be even better. - If I create a task without taking a screenshot, I lose the ability to name the Screen according to it's location. - Can you enable the Screen field within all tasks so they can be named \& sorted regardless of having an attached screenshot? Or, allow us to add a screenshot after the task has been created, and then I can rename it. - Include a page link within each task so you click straight through to the website (for example, on hover of the screenshot image, include an icon that links to the website page) - Allow formatting of text within the task description (eg. bold, underline, bullets) - Allow 'Select All' or option on task filters ----- ### "Digital Product Reviews with east" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. November 2018* | E-Learning | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: -Simple and easy way to track needed edits -Ability to see exact locations of needed changes -Collaboration of the entire team and client in one place -Tracking all changes throughout the life of a project -Customer support > > **Nachteile**: -Missing a few features, like the ability to archive older versions / feedback, but these are being rolled out continuously -Occasional down times, but this is getting less frequent -User interface is still a little clunky and needs some updates ----- ### "The easiest & most useful, but not the only place to find jobs" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. November 2018* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: lots of local listings, very easy to use and apply for jobs > > **Nachteile**: hard to find remote jobs, not all job matches are a true match, too many emails matching me to jobs that don't match, and misleading headlines in the emails saying there are certain types of jobs available, but when i look at the listing it doesn't add up > > i wish more job boards made it this easy to apply. i also like the feature that lets me know if a company is interested in me. i guess another thing would be that i've yet to get a job through this site. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/150774/zipboard?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/150774/zipboard) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten