Wir helfen Unternehmen in der Schweiz
seit 17 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über Ghost Inspector

Ein Test- und Überwachungsprodukt, mit dem du die Funktionalität deiner Website mit automatisierten Browsertests überprüfen kannst.

Erfahre mehr über Ghost Inspector

Vorteile:

Ghost Inspector fast and easy to use and very helpful to detect bugs.

Nachteile:

Does not support properly multiple browsers to run the tests.

Bewertungen zu Ghost Inspector

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4.4
Kundenservice
4.2
Funktionen
4.0
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3.9

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8/10

Ghost Inspector hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4.3 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 13 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (13)

Sortieren nach

Haben Sie Ghost Inspector bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwarekäufern.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (13)

Will
Will
Head of IT Operations & Support in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A clever way to automate front-end tests on websites

5.0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

Being able to record and then test a particular workflow on our key websites, to ensure they are running as expected. These results can then be emailed to our team to ensure any issues are resolved quickly.

Nachteile:

The 'small' price plan could be cheaper as there are users (like us) who use it infrequently. This small price plan is perhaps too generous in terms of the number of tests you can run, we don't even get close to 10,000, so their pricing could do with a few tiers below the 'small' one.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent bridge between manual and automated testing

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

If you're a company looking into cost-efficient automated testing options, this is it. I've worked as an employee through Ghost Inspector for over a year, and during that time I had to test all of the functionalities of a website. GS provided an easy to use platform where knowing the basics of XML would be enough to complete most of the tasks. I won't speak of the pricing as I haven't been paying for it myself, but I will say it's definitely faster and cost-efficient to start with GS than to make your own framework.

Nachteile:

There are certain limitations that come with a service such as this, with some of the elements not being reachable.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple and effective tool for web browser testing

3.0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

- Simple and easy capture feature with some useful customizations. - Easy to manage test suites - Possibility to reuse tests

Nachteile:

- Serious limitations in terms of test flows (does not allow if/else validations nor while cycles). - Tests can take long times to run in the cloud - Impossible to step by step debug.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

interesting tool

5.0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

As a non-technical person, I am able to record tests without writing a single line of code and I am able to modify the steps to be reusable

Nachteile:

doesn't support grouping, doesn't support jira integration, doesn't support multiple platforms and supports both FF and Chrome

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Druck, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple tool to get automated tests up and running.

5.0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Really easy to use, just click through your site, record all scenarios, schedule tests etc. Really easy to use for non-technical people.

Nachteile:

If your site is not very static, if it has many dynamic elements, pages - you can expect that these tests will often break when you change something. This is what happened to us and we stopped using this tool because we had to fix the tests too often. If your site does not change so often, then this is a great way to know if something breaks. As the tests are run in the cloud, you cant run them on your local environment. Speed is not so good, but that does not really matter in most cases.

Antwort von Ghost Inspector

vor 6 Jahren

Thank you for your review! We totally hear you on test maintenance. It's one of the biggest challenges that comes with browser testing. We've got a few features (like test modularization) that are designed to help, and a few more features being developed. We know that we've still got a ways to go, but we're working to make test management as painless as possible. We hope we can offer something a little better suited to your situation in the future. Thanks again!

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

The application that our QA Team use to run automatic tests in our application

4.0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Currently, Ghost Inspector is the tool that our QA team uses to run our automatic regression testing in our applications. It is also easy to integrate with other applications and send reports of the test results.

Nachteile:

The user experience should be improved, sometimes is not easy to train new colleagues on this tool but with some time investment, they stay autonomous.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

We use Ghost Inspector for effective high level integration testing

4.0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Ghost Inspector makes it extremely easy to put together some pretty comprehensive integration tests a website or web-app. Ghost Inspector's test creation workflow is extremely easy to use, and the ability to see screenshots and videos of tests when they fail is fantastic.

Nachteile:

As is often the case, I find the pricing a bit steep. We've also got some (admittedly edge-case) needs that we'd love the Chrome testing agent to be able to do (particularly around multimedia) which GI doesn't currently support, but I have hope that they'll get there eventually.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ghost Inspector

4.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Nothing special i used the free trial so i didn't use all modules in this software but the trial was very helpful for me and my production

Vorteile:

Ghost Inspector fast and easy to use and very helpful to detect bugs

Nachteile:

Very fast software many modules to use and very helpful it saves time.

Aqsa
Aqsa
Senior Test Automation Engineer in Pakistan
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy Way to Automation

4.0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Ghost Inspector is the best choice for people who are new to the automation field. By just following the flow this tool gives you each and every step/selector/assertion to write in your code. Very easy to use for beginners.

Nachteile:

There are some limitations that you face and when you have large suites/projects with more than 10 screens to run then it's not a suitable option for you.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Automated QA Testing made Simple

4.0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Qa is an important process of SDLC. Ghost inspector has made Qa process faster and easier.

Vorteile:

Ability to automate the QA process. Seamless integration with Google chrome through an extension.

Nachteile:

Inability to bypass Google recaptcha while testing.

Antwort von Ghost Inspector

vor 6 Jahren

Thank you for your review! We're glad Ghost Inspector has helped to make your QA process faster and easier.

Leonardo
Software QA Engineer in Niederlande
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for browser testing

4.0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I have a great experience with Ghost Inspector. It really helps my team to assess the quality of the software we are building

Vorteile:

I really like the usability of this tool and how complete is the documentation to help you create and execute test cases for your web platform

Nachteile:

I think it is a little expensive for the amount of feature it offers when you compare it to other frameworks

Marija
AQA in Nordmazedonien
Forschung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Usefull tool

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy fast to setup. regular testing structure i use much more should i say "open source (open hands ) " frameworks and runners but ghost insp. has always been my choice for quick show of skills on an interview or setting up playground env for junior qa's or anything that can release a person from the hassle of setting up when you just wanna crash your site

Nachteile:

Not so much open source , well not at all but thats fine for the purpose i use it.

Amol
QA in UK
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good cloud based tool for testing

4.0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

i have used the software to try automate web projects and it has good folder structure to organise the tests

Nachteile:

does not support properly multiple browsers to run the tests