--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über BrowserStack zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Prüfsoftware](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/162900/browserstack Seite: 1 / 31\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Ein browserübergreifendes Testwerkzeug zum Testen des reaktiven Designs. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 749 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet BrowserStack? Entwicklungsteams in verschiedenen Branchen, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Finanzen und Versicherungen, Bildungswesen, Technologie, Medien und Publishing, Einzelhandel und viele andere. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 749 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 39.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Compliance-Verfolgung - Continuous-Integration-Tools - Datenvisualisierung - Dokumentenmanagement - Engpass-Identifizierung - Lager-Management - Lastszenarien - Lasttests - Leistungskennzahlen - Leistungsmanagement - Management von Softwaretests - Mobile Tests - Multiple Test Types - Netzwerküberwachung - Performance-Tests - Problem-Nachverfolgung - Projektmanagement - Qualitätssicherung - Quantitative Metriken - Risikomanagement - Rückverfolgbarkeit - Störfallmanagement - Test-Management - Testskript-Bewertungen - Testskripts - Umfragen & Feedback - Unterstützt parallele Ausführung - Verfolgen von Fehlern - Versionskontrolle - Videoaufzeichnung / Transkription - Web-Tests - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Wirtschaftsprüfung-Management - Workflow-Management - Zielgruppen-Targeting - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen - hierarchische Ansicht - Überwachung ## Integrationen (16 insgesamt) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... und 1 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.ch/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 2. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.ch/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.ch/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 4. [Userlytics](https://www.capterra.ch/software/181202/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 5. [Userbrain](https://www.capterra.ch/software/141082/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Great Coverage" — 5.0/5 > **Amar** | *24. März 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly easy. The wide range of real devices and browsers available on demand is a huge advantage, especially when compared to maintaining an in-house device lab. The interface is intuitive, and setting up tests (both manual and automated) is straightforward. Integration with tools like Selenium, Cypress, and CI/CD pipelines works smoothly. > > **Nachteile**: The pricing can be a bit high for smaller teams or startups. Also, performance can occasionally lag when using certain real devices, especially during peak hours. > > Overall, BrowserStack has significantly improved our QA workflow by reducing testing time and increasing coverage. It’s a dependable tool for ensuring consistent user experience across platforms. Despite the cost, the value it provides makes it worth the investment for teams that prioritize quality. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24. März 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Nachteile**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- ### "Easier to use simulators/emulators" — 1.0/5 > **Zach** | *23. März 2026* | Konsumgüter | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It had a decent availability of Android and iOS mobile devices and OS versions, including new OS versions. That's about it. > > **Nachteile**: Issue resolution, support, lots of downtime and issues that would cause test failures - all resulting in really poor usage as an automated testing device provider > > It was a large part of my job just tracking failures on browserstack devices, hounding their support to fix things, and triaging flaky test failures that stemmed from excessively variable device states. It is not worth it to use this provider for automated testing for this reason alone. Use simulators and emulators. They are sufficient for catching 99.99% of issues. ----- ### "Reliable and Efficient Testing Platform with Minor Drawbacks" — 5.0/5 > **Arfa** | *26. März 2026* | Bekleidung & Mode | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: its extensive real device and browser coverage, which makes cross-browser testing seamless and reliable. The ease of use and quick setup allow teams to start testing without heavy configuration. It significantly speeds up testing cycles and helps identify issues early, improving overall product quality > > **Nachteile**: its pricing, which can be quite high for smaller teams. Additionally, automation setup and debugging can be a bit complex, and session timeouts or flaky connections sometimes impact the overall testing experience. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been positive. It provides a reliable platform for cross-browser and real device testing, making it easier to identify and fix issues across different environments. The interface is user-friendly, and it helps speed up testing cycles significantly. While there are occasional performance lags and the pricing can be a concern, the overall value it delivers in terms of efficiency and test coverage makes it a strong tool for QA teams ----- ### "User-Friendly Platform, Yet Customer Support Needs Improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Arthi** | *24. März 2026* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The UI of BrowserStack is clean, intuitive, and easy to navigate. Most of the frequently used features—like device selection, browser choices, and test session controls—are clearly visible and well‑organized. The overall usability is smooth, and switching back and forth between devices or test sessions feels seamless. The platform offers straightforward access to essential tools such as logs, screenshots, and videos, making debugging much faster. Overall, the interface supports a very user‑friendly testing experience with minimal learning curve. > > **Nachteile**: The response I received from \[sensitive content hidden\] came across as quite rude. It gave me the impression that BrowserStack may not be fully prepared to assist customers who have doubts or questions. If new customers are addressed in this manner, it raises concerns about the level of support provided to existing customers as well. > > Overall, my experience has been positive so far. I’m still getting familiar with the application, but the learning curve has been manageable. It would be beneficial to have more integrations with other tools and platforms, as this would further enhance usability and workflow efficiency. ----- Seite: 1 / 31\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162900/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten