--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über TestMu AI zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestMu AI Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Prüfsoftware](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/170732/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/170732/lambdatest Seite: 1 / 23\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) > Die zuverlässige Testausführungsplattform von LambdaTest hilft Nutzern, die Entwickler-Feedback-Zeit zu verkürzen und eine schnellere Markteinführung zu erreichen. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 543 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet TestMu AI? Digitale Marketing- und Kreativagenturen, Webdesign-, Entwicklungs- und Softwaretestunternehmen, Systemintegratoren, PaaS-, SaaS-, internetbasierte, E-Learning-Unternehmen und viele andere. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 543 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: LambdaTest - **Region**: San Francisco, USA - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 15.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Aruba, Australien, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgien, Belize, Bermuda, Britische Jungferninseln, Bulgarien, Costa Rica, Deutschland, Dominica, Dominikanische Republik, Dänemark, El Salvador, Finnland, Frankreich und 43 weitere ## Funktionen - Anforderungsmanagement - Audit Trail - Datenvisualisierung - Management von Softwaretests - Projektmanagement - Testskript-Bewertungen - Unterstützt parallele Ausführung - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Integrationen (15 insgesamt) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support ## Category - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.ch/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 3. [WebLOAD](https://www.capterra.ch/software/138288/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 4. [Centercode](https://www.capterra.ch/software/187442/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) 5. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.ch/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A Reliable and Efficient Cross-Browser Testing Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Navneet** | *17. März 2025* | Logistik & Lieferkette | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: LambdaTest's intuitive interface and extensive browser compatibility testing have significantly streamlined our testing processes. > > **Nachteile**: To date, we have not encountered any issues while using LambdaTest. > > My overall experience with LambdaTest has been highly positive. The platform provides a comprehensive and user-friendly solution for cross-browser testing, making it incredibly easy to test websites and web applications across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices. The intuitive interface and seamless navigation allowed me to quickly set up and execute tests without any hassle. ----- ### "This service is a life-saver" — 5.0/5 > **Jörn** | *27. Februar 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I especially like the ease of being able to test our sites in a multitude of different browsers and operating systems without having to have the actual systems around. > > **Nachteile**: In the absolute beginning of our test journey we tried accessing one of our private sites that was not accessible on the open internet at that time and it took us a few minutes to download and enable the integrated tunnel - but that was entirely on us, the UI did not hide that feature at all. > > We are using this service for about a year now and only had to read through documentation once because the UI is so intuitive. Because of this we did not have to reach out to customer support once. ----- ### "Real device cloud that’s rarely available" — 2.0/5 > **Eshani** | *17. Februar 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It’s easy to start using and requires minimal setup. UI is also clean The session recording feature is useful for capturing issues and sharing exact behavior with clients or developers during manual testing. > > **Nachteile**: Real device availability has been a major issue in our use. New iPhones and Ultra devices are frequently unavailable or show “Device Not Available,” sometimes for long periods. Specially during our peak hours. There is also a gap between the device list you see on Free Trial and what can actually be accessed at the exact same time. Devices appear selectable but cannot be launched on paid plan when needed, making me question the entire point of this Over time, we also saw reliability decline, with sessions failing to start or dropping during manual testing more often than expected. > > Overall experience has been disappointing. Picked testmu because it was cheaper. During the trial the platform looked promising, but in regular use real device availability has been inconsistent, especially for new iPhones and Ultra devices. We frequently encounter “Device Not Available,” Because we rely on manual testing across specific devices for global clients, predictable access is critical. The gap between listed devices and what can actually be launched reduced confidence in using the platform for scheduled validation or release work. While basic sessions and recording are straightforward to use, reliability of real devices has not met expectations, so it has been difficult to depend on. ----- ### "Excellant FeedBack working on Cloud devices from LambdaTest" — 5.0/5 > **KETAN** | *16. Januar 2026* | Bankwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: TestMU AI (prior LambdaTest) is an excellent cloud based testing platform which helped us testing out apps over multiple cloud devices. It provides many variations in which a user can select ranging from Android to iOS, with sim without sin devices. Excellant tool > > **Nachteile**: Basically the sessions recordings were not great and few of the devices were responding slow subject to their data centres reach and availablity > > It has been a good experience working with the lambda test and it provides us a great support in terms of like app testing (UAT OR production apps), so it was a great platform in which we use to upload our apps through Google drive or manually and then it used to test across many cloud platform ranging from Android to iOS and there are good provisions in which you know you can add multiple devices ----- ### "A Powerful and Smooth Testing Experience" — 5.0/5 > **Yury** | *27. Februar 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: TestMu AI pleasantly surprised me with its accuracy, speed, and ease of use. The interface is intuitive, the features are powerful, and the automation saves a huge amount of time during testing. I especially appreciate how smoothly test management and browser/device testing work. Everything feels polished and reliable. > > **Nachteile**: I honestly didn’t encounter anything significant to complain about. Some features could be expanded even further in the future, but the current experience is already excellent. > > My overall experience with TestMu AI has been extremely positive. It streamlined my testing workflow, reduced repetitive tasks through smart automation, and provided very stable results. The platform feels modern, responsive, and thoughtfully designed. It noticeably boosts productivity and makes testing much more pleasant and efficient. I would definitely recommend it to other QA engineers and teams looking for a reliable testing solution. ----- Seite: 1 / 23\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/170732/lambdatest) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten