Wir helfen Unternehmen in der Schweiz
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) ist eine Cloud-Objektspeicherplattform für eine sichere und einfache Erfassung, Speicherung und Analyse von Daten.

Erfahre mehr über Amazon S3

Vorteile:

I like the most that they have integrations and documentation for almost every technology availlable, its fast and easy to use, what more could you ask for.

Nachteile:

The only limitation is this can not be used as a block storage and it do not support formatting and can used for object purpose.

Bewertungen zu Amazon S3

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4.3
Kundenservice
4.4
Funktionen
4.6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4.5

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8.7/10

Amazon S3 hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4.7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 1’088 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Haben Sie Amazon S3 bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwarekäufern.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (1’088)

Proinsias
Proinsias
Owner Manager Digital Specialist in Irland
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Onlinemedien, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Difficult to setup, but when you do, you will be delighted

5.0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I work on websites with many photographs and useing Amazon S3 has greatly imporoved my page loading speeds. Its has save me money as I do not have to pay extra for Web Service Space. Also Amazon S3 on its own is like a CDN or Content Delivery Network. On one of my projects, I am storing PDF files on S3.

Vorteile:

Great Value for money when it comes to Cloud Storage Great for Photographers to help boost there page speed loading and Google Ranking Reduces costs on te Web Host Server as Pictures, PDF Files and Video are not on the main server

Nachteile:

Difficult to setup and get all your credentials Can be cumbersome if you have a lot of photographs or files. You may need to invest in a plugin to automatically upload the content to S3 automatically.

Yurie Katri
Yurie Katri
DevOps Engineer in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 10’000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

The heart of the cloud is no longer limited to discussion of storage

4.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: As storage, it is secure and economical, or it can handle processing that requires high performance, and detailed selection and configuration are possible. It is a basic and necessary function that forms the core of the cloud together with EC2. The price and performance change automatically according to the frequency of access, so content and variety can be chosen according to the user. S3's billing system is basically pay-as-you-go and control of the operation is straightforward. Considering the security, maintenance and start-up skills required, rather than owning an actual computer, it appears to be considerably cheaper.

Vorteile:

Secure feel with ultra-high durability. Convenient data entry through integration with various services. Really easy and convenient. Flexibility to activate Lambda based on S3 events (but there are problems). Flexible security configuration by configuring S3 and IAM. Flexible pricing depends on the frequency of use (although it is cheap to start with). Recently, I was very happy to be able to use it as a data storage location for AWS Transfer for FTP. Since the server less FTP host environment was created, the operation is very simple.

Nachteile:

The activation of the S3 event is not guaranteed. In exceptional cases, it may not trigger and you may have to write another Lambda for recovery. This is problematic.

Gordon
Head of Data in UK
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon S3 - great product

4.0 vor 2 Monaten

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is a really flexible product that easy to use, its really easy to share the files with others but mostly great for uploading data from S3 into Redshift

Nachteile:

The thing i dislike the most is the changes sometimes introduced means changing several processes.

Tonia
IT Administrator in USA
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon S3 review

3.0 vor 11 Monaten

Kommentare: Amazon S3 did exactly what I wanted it to do once I got past the setup obstacles. It is a bit difficult to navagate. Amazon does offer free training for their products which is a plus.

Vorteile:

With Amazon being such a large company, we can use multiple technologies with only one bill. Amazon is well known and does a good job at storing and retaining my data. Amazon has many more features than their competitors which is great if you know how to set them up and run them. Amazon S3 does offer free training for their products which is helpful.

Nachteile:

Amazon S3 platform is hard to navigate, I feel it is ment for an advanced user rather than someone who is trying out new technology. Amazon is a bit higher priced than many competitors.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AWS S3: The Ultimate Storage Solution with file versioning, integration with multiple AWS services

5.0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: I am happy with AWS s3 with handling large static data with one write and many read purpose, good experince with s3

Vorteile:

Its support multiple AWS services, we can easily integrate s3 with other aws services, we can add media images, videos, zip files, log files in s3 and access anywhere in internet with permission. we can also use s3 for storing and hosting static website and low cost. offering different storage classes for cost optimization and uses.

Nachteile:

1. Permission Handling 2. Access data anywhere in internet 3. Support CDN 4. Integration with multiple AWS services 5. storing archive data files 6. versioning control 7. transfering speed

Daniel
Daniel
Founder in Argentinien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Amazon S3 is a solid brand, but not for amateurs

5.0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I started using S3 as a off-site backup tool, and then I scaled up to use other services. It's serves it purpose rather well, but tends to be a little cumbersome, with many changes along the way and somehow a strict business model.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 defined the cloud in the begining. It's services were disruptive and much needed. I think that S3 it's a very solid option for backup and file retention.

Nachteile:

However, it's not for the casual user. There are other, new and easy to use services aimed to the small business, wich offers a better way to deploy, are more cost-effective and have a more down-to-earth approach.

Rocky
Rocky
Course Building Technologist and Business Coach on the Education Team in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bildungsmanagement, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cheap Reliable storage in the cloud

5.0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Amazon S3 solved our storage needs. Prior, the company was storing everything on their own servers. If the site went down, so did our files. Amazon's reliability is why we use the S3.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is like Dropbox/Google Drive, but on Amazon's cloud server. That means, it's fast with a 99.9% uptime. All of our public-facing course material is secured on Amazon S3, and I don't have to worry about the server being down.

Nachteile:

There's a learning curve. It's kind of ugly - I'm not expecting someone to use it right out of the box. There's lots of options to choose from, and you could accidentally expose all of your sensitive data if you didn't set it up correctly.

Adeyeye
Adeyeye
Founder in Nigeria
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Adeyeye George Review

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We are working on file manager design for health services and S3 has been our best pick to make this happen. Without S3, we might not have been able to do this. Thanks to Amazon.

Vorteile:

My first love point is the documentations and easy integrations. Using the PHP SDK with the robust documentation had made our project fast and easy. Secondly, the cost... Using S3 for file storage is more cheaper than Dropbox. Thirdly: Ability to generate links and time of expiry is really great. I love this feature like cake.

Nachteile:

We are expecting S3 to have a streaming feature. It should be possible to stream huge files directly without downloading it. Well, this feature does not affect us currently but we will definitely need this in the future.

Jessy
usuária in Brasilien
Internet, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon products.

5.0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: So far my experience with Amazon has been very smooth and successfull.

Vorteile:

What i like most about Amazon is that i can find everything i want very easily, with good prices and quality products.

Nachteile:

I have nothing to complain about Amazon, at least not so far.

Riccardo
Marketing Director in Italien
Maschinenbau oder Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

The perfect cloud solution

5.0 vor 2 Monaten

Vorteile:

Fast, worldwide, and with tons of functionalities

Nachteile:

Not easy to set up, you would definitely need a technician

Sushank
DevOps Engineer in Indien
Immobilien, 501–1’000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A Simple and affordable storage in cloud

4.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: AWS S3 is Simple Storage Service by AWS which allows you to store data on the cloud at an affordable price.
You can use s3 to store large data like static data, documents, images, videos, etc on cloud and access it anywhere.
We can host static websites on it if you owning a business and want a simple solution to host a static website you can use this option.

Vorteile:

In this growing world, data is the most important so storage of the huge data is very important, Amazon's Simple Storage Service (s3) is the best and affordable cloud storage service available in the market. We can store huge and any kind of data on S3 like Documents, Text Files, PDF, Audio, Video, etc. There are multiple storage options available with S3 like frequent data and infrequently used data can be stored on AWS Glacier low-cost storage. The data is secured on AWS s3 with multi-level access protocols eg public, private, etc

Nachteile:

AWS S3 is not compatible with system-level like desktops, it should have something with which it can use used that will be very easy. We can not store more files more than 5 GB in size

MANAS
Senior Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 1’001–5’000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly available distributed storage system with additional features and settings

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: I am having a great experience with Amazon S3, it really dose the things required in a really great way

Vorteile:

This is a core part in most of our use cases , be it big-data computations , databases like redshift, aurora and snowflakes, be it for building a static or redirecting website and what not , it is i think the cheapest cloud distributed storage system and can be integrated with almost everything, integrate it with AWS Athena to analyse on file data, or run copy commands on snowflake or redshift databases to move the data around from or to db etc, or use it on hadoop hive tables by creating the external tables, it supports integration with java, python, or command line interface , so that you can automate the processes without any issues, and the s3 buckets can have security group attached, and lots of settings available in part of security, and can publicly expose some files , can create static web pages & redirecting web pages for both http and https (need some help from cloud front)

Nachteile:

the file naming we is a problem if we have a starting sub string as a file name, example if i had 2 files namely aaabbb and aaa , when i like to select the data of aaa, the data of aaabbb is also selected , because the s3 always treats the file name as filename* and one more thing is the static web support is good and easy to setup for http but for https its difficult need the help of aws cloud-front

Bernard
IT Administrator in UK
E-Learning, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Amazon S3 Review

5.0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Flawless and worth every penny

Vorteile:

The ease of use. As simple as drag and drop on to the cloud. Very useful for large cloud data storage.

Nachteile:

There is nothing no not like about S3 truly

Diego
CTO in Spanien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Amazon is on the right track with this solution

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I have been working for more than 3 years with cloud solutions, Amazon offers the best on from my point of view and personal opinion.

Vorteile:

Fast and easy setup and deployment. Very comprehensive and intuitive.

Nachteile:

Price, this solution suite is more expensive than the competition, but it’s value justify it.

Kevin
Kevin
CEO / Chief Software Architect in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A benchmark service for all others to aspire to

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Once you get beyond the basics, the learning curve can be pretty steep, but given a bit of time to research the service can be a very powerful tool for a large swath of use cases.

Vorteile:

Amazon's S3 service is the benchmark that all others compare themselves to and has inspired an entire industry of object storage services. In fact in our experience with other "S3 Compatible" services, they generally recommend installing the AWS CLI application in order to manage the advanced features of their own services. S3 provides a highly customizable service at a very cost effective price, with the added benefit of either reduced performance or redundancy for even lower prices.

Nachteile:

In some cases the documentation and examples available are a little thin or spread out in different places. The examples specifically surrounding bucket policies are a bit cryptic but usable.

Vandana
Vandana
Business Analyst in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Unternehmensberatung, 10’000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon Simple Storage Service for objective storage.

5.0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: AWS S3 is the most efficient way to store the objects in cloud. Monitoring on objects can be also possible with the cloud watch. The backup of EBS can be also stored on S3. Under Free Tier user get the five gigabyte of S3 storage of standard class with fifteen gigabyte data transfer for twelve months. Region for S3 objects must be selected based on the speed and budget.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is an industry-leading cloud solution for storing the objects. Managing and monitoring the object storage with Amazon S3 is simple and easy. S3 object tags help in managing the objects. S3 batch operation help in moving the objects from one bucket or object class to other. Features like cross-region replication help to replicate the data into the other aws region and reduce the objects latency. S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class is really efficient as it moves the data as per the patterns and frequent access which helps to reduce the cost.

Nachteile:

The latency of deep archive data is so high that it needs to be reduced. The One Zone-Infrequent Access is the least recommended for production environment as it provides the least data availability across all other storage classes.

Frank
Frank
Co-Founder, CTO and Product Lead in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gastgewerbe, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Market leader in what is becoming a crowded space

4.0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, AWS is the safest bet in the cloud business. You can safely assume that it will be reliable, cost-effective, and cover basically any service that a cloud provider can offer. It's UI/UX is middle of the road and gets the job done. Having said that, there are other challengers that are providing compelling alternatives, making the decision not as much of a no-brainer as it used to be.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is probably the first solution that comes to mind for a company looking for cloud services. It's basically created the space and as such has incredible depth and breadth of services offered. AWS likely covers any type of scenario your company might need and with data centers all over the world, data latency is at a minimum. Its uptime is similarly among the best in class. There are also many options for server loads and speeds that can help keep costs low for fledgling companies.

Nachteile:

As with most companies that come to define a space, they always have a target on their back. In practice that means that there are more and more solutions that compete with AWS. They may not compete 1 to 1 with it, but for many companies, there may be another provider that has better UX and ease of use along with cheaper prices for their setup. AWS suffers from bloat which leads to a UX that can be a bit intimidating and cumbersome. They offer so many different types of services that it can be daunting to peruse through the menus and submenus. Their UI is fairly utilitarian and while not ugly per se, it's not as pleasant to use and look at.

Giovanni
Giovanni
Analyst Programmer in Panama
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bankwesen, 1’001–5’000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A very useful storage service for your website

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: This host allows me to store several websites in one place, since many of my clients have more than one website this is a perfect solution to have everything in one place, so you have greater control of the sites and you always know where they are.

Vorteile:

It is a very reliable and stable service, your website will always be available to everyone who accesses it, its costs are relatively low, very useful for medium and large companies. You have a wide variety of customization that perfectly fit your day-to-day needs. You can go from a very basic service, which because it is basic does not mean that you will not have a wide variety of services, on the contrary you will have a wide variety at your disposal.

Nachteile:

If you do not have experience interacting with amazon environments, you can lose a bit, as was my case at the beginning, but when you get the hang of it, everything looks easier. You can always find online course for this service that won't be expensive and you will learn a lot from them, then you will realize how easy is to use this service.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Marketing & Werbung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best global cloud solution provider!

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: My experience with Amazon S3 has been great and my teams feedback is the same. The product line really helps you get a product into production quickly, and the support teams are very knowledgeable with their product line and industry standards to help with custom needs.

Vorteile:

So functions with in Amazon S3 fit any line of business use case, and their custom developed integrations and 3rd party support are the best in the business in helping you deliver great products.

Nachteile:

The only thing that I would say is that the learning curve to support teams developing on AWS is greater than other cloud providers.

Jugraj
Software Engineer in Indien
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best Storage Space with very low operational cost and ideal file storage for other AWS services

5.0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 as short for simple storage service. It is a secure object storage ideal for keeping files that are used be aws services like Athena, Elastic Map Reduce, etc. We can perform ETL Jobs written HIVE queries on the data stored in Amazon Athena supported formats on S3 directly. Which provide great performance on huge amount of data. Amazon EMR is another service that treat S3 as a type of local storage means cost and time of read-write operations in same region is as low as possible resulting in faster Job execution. S3 is another place where all other services store there logs. Having a negligible cost makes it ideal place to store a huge amount of files logs and other.

Nachteile:

Amazon S3 is a object storage. We can update a file/object stored in it only way to update a file is to download it make the changes and upload it by deleting the old one in other words overwriting it. Which generate unnecessary read-write network bandwidth when we have to update small change in a large file. Another drawback is its maintaining versions of same file. we can do it but not as easy as other file storage systems. Also i find no way to integrating it with my local system like OneDrive is integrated into windows making hard to transfer file in and out of the system.

NOEL
Account Advisor in USA
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great option for file storage

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall it has been a great tool for hosting files, both submitted through our web app but also internal files that we serve on our site. It allows us to control who has access to certain buckets and an easy way to securely receive files from our clients.

Vorteile:

We use S3 buckets to store data that is submitted through our website. This is great because it allows sensitive data to be uploaded and transferred securely to our team. It also allows for quite a bit of security on the back end to ensure that no one is able to get in and access your files. When you want to host files for your website, this is a great option as well. Whether you're looking to host image files or some other asset. Linking to your S3 bucket allows for easy asset management.

Nachteile:

S3 buckets are a bit complicated to set up. We luckily have an AWS administrator who handles most of it but I definitely found there to be a learning curve that required reading a few online guides to make sure I was configuring it correctly. With that complication, however, comes the ability to really control the security level of your buckets.

Abhinav
Abhinav
Sr Software Integrator in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501–1’000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

An Object Storage Solution by Amazon

5.0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Amazon S3 scalability is the best thing helping for our business. It's also very cost effective as you don't have to pay what you don't want to use. In the today era AWS is a big giant and everyone want to host it services one best infrastructure.

Vorteile:

Amazon Simple Storage Service also know as Amazon S3 is the one of the best service under the cloud solution with the most trusted name Amazon Web Service. Scalability is the one of the best feature we get under the hood of the Amazon S3 as you will never get out of space one the main time when you actually need the space and scale it back when we don't need it. Billing cycle is also very flexible and only charge you what you use. Operation Team can handle it and work under this is also infrastructure is more transparent.

Nachteile:

Amazon S3 provide the object storage we can not run website all on it. It need helping hand from it's sister services like CloudFront, EC2 and RDS or Dynamo DB to make it really work. Managing firewall for it also one of the challenging part as you do not want the loophole in your storage solution.

Abdellatif
Abdellatif
Freelancer in Frankreich
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon’s best

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We are chipping away at record chief plan for wellbeing administrations and S3 has been our best pick to get this going. Without S3, we probably won't have had the option to do this. On account of Amazon.

Vorteile:

My most memorable love point is the documentations and simple incorporations. Utilizing the PHP SDK with the hearty documentation had made our venture quick and simple. Besides, the expense... Involving S3 for record capacity is more less expensive than Dropbox. Thirdly: Ability to produce connections and season of expiry is truly perfect. I love this component like cake.

Nachteile:

We are anticipating that S3 should have a streaming component. It ought to be feasible to stream colossal documents straightforwardly without downloading it. Indeed, this element doesn't influence us presently however we will require this later on.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Scalable storage for scalable apps

5.0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

In these days for AI, Big Data, machine learning you need data storage which is reliable in terms of your data always be available when you need it, when amazon launched Africa region servers in Cape Town it even made sense for us to use AWS for storage services and its very affordable prices as you only pay for what you use.

Nachteile:

You really need to know what you are doing specially when comes to using S3 for machine learning some data sets might just increase your data storage you will need to optimise your data so as to reduce cost in storage.

Saurabh
Saurabh
Functional Consultant in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best Storage Services Offered

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is a premium software in terms of its Security. It helps in Providing the Storage Services. It helps in easy integration with other Platforms as well. Also it has a Permission Matrix that helps in restricting the Rights User Wise. It is accessible worldwide so it becomes an easy medium to Transfer Data from one Location to Another with Great Encryption. Also, using the storage services we can host our Website in order to Use with Maximum Performance

Nachteile:

Permission Assigning could be made more simplified plus the reduction in costing can help alot.