--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Travelogic zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Travelogic Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Reiseveranstalter Software](/directory/20033/tour-operator/software) > [Travelogic](/software/74195/travelogic) # Travelogic Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/74195/travelogic Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74195/travelogic?page=2) > Tourbetriebsmanagementlösung für die Rationalisierung von Angeboten, Buchungen und Reiseplanvorbereitungsprozessen. > > Bewertung: **3.4/5** von 21 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Travelogic? Die Reisemanagementlösung wurde für Inbound-/Outbound-Reiseunternehmen sowie Destinationsmanagement- und Bodenabfertigungsunternehmen und Agenturen entwickelt und unterstützt bei der Verwaltung von Angeboten bis hin zur Reiseroute. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **3.4/5** | 21 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Travelogic - **Gegründet**: 2003 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: ZAR 80.00 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Windows (Desktop) - **Verfügbare Länder**: Südafrika ## Funktionen - CRM-Systeme - GDS-/OTA-Integration - Lieferanten-Management - Preismanagement - Reiseplan erstellen - Reservierungs-Management - Zahlungsabwicklung ## Optionen für Kundensupport - Chat ## Category - [Reiseveranstalter Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20033/tour-operator/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Bókun](https://www.capterra.ch/software/178518/bokun) — 4.7/5 (452 reviews) 2. [Nitro for Incoming Tour Operators](https://www.capterra.ch/software/188481/nitro) — 4.8/5 (19 reviews) 3. [WeTravel](https://www.capterra.ch/software/163474/wetravel) — 4.8/5 (524 reviews) 4. [Peek Pro](https://www.capterra.ch/software/142459/peek-pro-tour-operator-software) — 4.7/5 (794 reviews) 5. [Rezdy](https://www.capterra.ch/software/122690/rezdy) — 4.5/5 (237 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Touring Perspective - Escape+Explore" — 4.0/5 > **Llauren** | *16. September 2019* | Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The ease of loading in rates and packages for the consulting team to be able to push out quotes/invoices timeously. > > **Nachteile**: It would be great if there was a calendar integration as well as an integration with XERO. Accounting is a huge issue on our end. We tried the integration with SAGE but this didn't work as the Sage updates were not communicated with Travelogic so the system would pull invoices into incorrect areas which made weeks of trying to catch up. Pastel isn't an option for us, so we now work on XERO but manually need to full everything into the system. If we could have one reliable integration then that would be key. > > Support in the past didn't seem to completely understand the crucial turn around when help and answers were needed. There has definitely been an improvement here\! ----- ### "Travelogic" — 4.0/5 > **Nicky** | *14. September 2019* | Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Quick and easy to load an itinerary, especially with the fairly recent updates that have been applied with regards to loading service lines under dates, it makes a lot more sense and much easier. > > **Nachteile**: Takes too much time waiting for amended dates one make to recognize and pull through ... removing a service line is quick ... would be nice if amendments could be as quick. The selection for location/countries is slow to recognise the first 3 or 4 letters of whichever country one is trying to select - time wasted here and if you select the incorrect country and want to make changes, not a quick process either > > This software is vital to our business in order to generate itineraries/proposals so cannot do with out it. It has progressed to be more user friendly over the course of time since we've been using it. ----- ### "No logic in it at times" — 3.0/5 > **Madeleine** | *21. September 2019* | Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The fact that you can do all the necessary documents in one system. From quote to invoice. Also, getting an idea of the profit one is making, the option for single and double rate. Being able to change status, from new to cancelled, it's a plus. Having a separate line for the tour leader, guide and driver is also a good thing. And I'm > > **Nachteile**: \*Once a booking has been created, if one needs to reduce the number of pax, it changes all the rates, even for the transfers, guide, or rate that are not per person rate which is not necessary because one might consider to use the same vehicle size and the guide fees will normally remain the same whether I have 20 or 30 pax. So this is very frustrating because one need to double-check the rate as per what was initially quoted. Recently I changed the start dates for my quote it took days for the change to eventually take place. My day one was stating day "0" instead of day 1 but the dates were matching. When I pull out an itinerary for FIT, the same photos for a certain property appear on any other itinerary or other property that I work on. At the bottom of the itinerary, where you have the breakdown for activities, accommodation, transfers etc, sometimes you find an activity under transfer... or a name of accommodation which is none of what I loaded. I dont understand why we should have a per person rate for line such as transfer/transport/guide's fee etc > > I must say the above mentioned are all recent... I didn't have the same problem... With all the above mentioned, this can be very frustrating and time-consuming, when trying to fix it before sending to client. ----- ### "Travelogic User Friendly" — 5.0/5 > **sharon** | *13. September 2019* | Gastgewerbe | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I find the software very user-friendly. There are 2 versions, one for FIT, individual travellers and the new version for groups. What is good about the normal version is that you can change days, copy services, amend mark up. Also, it prints out the itinerary and works in conjunction with WETU - very professional document > > **Nachteile**: There are times when the incorrect pictures are pulled through on the itinerary so you have to double-check everything. The system cannot be trusted to pull through correctly. The new version for groups - still in progress so my comments will have to wait until sorted as there are a lot of issues. Once it is running properly, I think it will be great > > The benefits are that it is definitely time-saving. Overall experience is good. ----- ### "Travelogic: user review" — 4.0/5 > **Kaveri** | *12. Mai 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The product is very easy to use. There are 2 adaptations, one for singular explorers and the new form for groups. What is acceptable about the ordinary form is that you can find all the necessary documents at one place. Likewise, it is quick and simple to stack an agenda, particularly with the genuinely late updates that have been applied concerning stacking service lines under dates, it bodes well and a lot simpler. > > **Nachteile**: Unfit to make test archives and passages that don't affect sums totalled by accounting. Unfit to forestall editing of recently created monetary archives. This should NEVER even be a choice with any reserving or accounting framework. Unfit to create reports/cautions concerning when monetary records are altered. > > Local support. WETU intergration. It is way cheaper than other systems. The advantages are that it is certainly efficient. Overall experience is acceptable ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74195/travelogic?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74195/travelogic) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten