--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Assembla zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assembla Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Source Code Control Systeme](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/112631/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/112631/assembla Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/112631/assembla?page=2) > Enterprise-Cloud-Version-Control für sicheres Quellcodemanagement. > > Bewertung: **4.2/5** von 103 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Assembla? Teams, die Software erstellen ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.2/5** | 103 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: IDERA - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 56.50 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 208 weitere ## Funktionen - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Audit Trail - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Backup und Recovery - Benutzerdefinierte Entwicklung - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Code-Repository-Integration - Codeprüfung - Continuous-Integration-Tools - Dokumentenmanagement - Fehlerverfolgung - Filesharing - Kollaborative Entwicklung - Meilensteinverfolgung - Portfoliomanagement - Problem-Nachverfolgung - Problemmanagement - Projektmanagement - Projektplanung/Terminierung - Ressourcenmanagement - Unterstützt zahlreiche Programmiersprachen - Versionskontrolle - Veränderungsmanagement - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Management - Zeit & Kosten Verfolgung ## Integrationen (14 insgesamt) - Dropbox - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.ch/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.ch/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1227 reviews) 3. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.ch/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1350 reviews) 4. [Notepad++](https://www.capterra.ch/software/185965/notepad) — 4.7/5 (2006 reviews) 5. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15494 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A one Hub solution that could work a bit faster" — 4.0/5 > **Corstiaan** | *4. Februar 2021* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's a one-hub solution. Everything I need is within reach. Task management and planning in the card-wall of tickets are indispensable. > > **Nachteile**: Slow: Opening a page or a ticket can sometimes take seconds of looking at a blank page. When used in meeting this is really annoying. Clutter: It lacks options to clean-up. Since I work with it for 10 years I have 150 projects in my view and no way to hide old projects. New projects appear at the bottom of that list, so scrolling galore\! Yes, I could go to the project-owner and ask him to archive, but you know how that goes in large companies and I don't have rights to archive so I'm stuck with over 10 years of old projects. GIT: It could use some more optimizations, specially Merge-request handling / canceling, retaining comments etc. > > It's a solution that has it all but I would welcome an overhaul of UI and backend optimization for speed. It feels like there's a lot of ancient code in there. ----- ### "Strive to be best toolset for development organization" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *11. Februar 2020* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is a cloud based solution and can be accessed from anywhere. Support for protocols like git. It has embedded document management workflow. > > **Nachteile**: Lack of support for document search. Lack of support for wide adoption among developers. No easy way of project management, bug tracking etc. At the least the versions that we used in the past. No management reports. It serves the basic purpose of source code management with git. No clear support for command line tools and scripting for ci/cd pipelines. > > It is ok for smaller teams. It is affordable. Not much of online documentation, but most parts are intuitive. ----- ### "Slow and inconvenient" — 1.0/5 > **ximena** | *3. Februar 2021* | Animationssoftware | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The Kaban and list view are convenient. Being able to add options to tickets are also good for management, and the prioritization set is good too. The way the tickets keep track of the dates and hours of every change in the ticket is really good. And the relationships you can build between tickets is good too. > > **Nachteile**: A don't like many things about this software, the main thing is that Is too hard to plan long-term using it. Also is hard to have access to quantitative reports. To keep all my information accurate and easy to access I use Airtable to organize the information I have on Assembla. Because Assembla is too slow and too hard to get reports from it. Everyone at my office does the same thing of using another tool to interpret and organize the info we have on Assembla. I think a Gantt view would help and a view more likely to excel in which you could add and edit tickets faster. It would be great if you could build features for the admins to build their own statistics and reports. And features to automate some actions on tickets. > > It has been not as good, the tool is slow and more like an old management tool. Also, the customer service is not very good. We had to report all manager for a whole week the same problem to get a follow up for the problem. For a whole week, all of our teams couldn't see the missing info on tickets, it was a waste of our time and resources. ----- ### "Assembla for SVN only" — 5.0/5 > **scott** | *6. Mai 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Reliable SVN Server, pretty fast, easy to manage > > **Nachteile**: We just use the SVN features, it's ridiculously expensive per person for SVN,. > > Other than the ridiculous cost its been extremely reliable for the past 7 years we have used it. We've had a couple short outages but they were very brief and got quick attention from their support. ----- ### "honest opinion" — 4.0/5 > **Steffano** | *13. Februar 2021* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It seems very secure, and I love the fact that you can see which files others have checked out, that's huge thing when working with a big team. > > **Nachteile**: It's super slow when you need to revert files or when you added 2k files to a submit queue and you decide not to move forward with the submit. That will take a lot of time and it's really annoying. One last thing is that is a pain in the ass for new users especially for artists to setup perforce, perforce should have automated tools to setup your workspace, like a wizard to ask you about the basics. Having to open the command to type manual commands is not intuitive. > > Even with its flaws it's a good option over git and svn, it has a nice webapp to help you keep track of the project and source files. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/112631/assembla?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/112631/assembla) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten