--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über eCivis zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: eCivis Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [eCivis](/software/122493/grants-network) # eCivis Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/122493/grants-network Seite: 1 / 7\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/122493/grants-network?page=2) > eCivis ist eines der führenden SaaS-Fördermittelverwaltungssysteme für staatliche und lokale Behörden und Stämme. > > Bewertung: **4.4/5** von 152 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet eCivis? eCivis bietet Bundesbehörden, lokalen Behörden, Stammesverwaltungen und ihren Community-Partner\*innen eine Fördermittelverwaltungssoftware. Das Unternehmen arbeitet auch mit Community-Colleges und Schulbezirken zusammen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.4/5** | 152 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: eCivis - **Gegründet**: 2000 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 5'200.00 - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Dokumentenprüfung - Erinnerungen - Finanzberichterstattung - Formularverwaltung - Förderungssuche - Vertrags-/Lizenz-Management - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zahlung-Nachverfolgung ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [DonorPerfect](https://www.capterra.ch/software/2698/donorperfect-fundraising-software) — 4.5/5 (1384 reviews) 2. [Bloomerang](https://www.capterra.ch/software/131207/bloomerang) — 4.7/5 (1287 reviews) 3. [Donorbox](https://www.capterra.ch/software/156860/donorbox) — 4.8/5 (624 reviews) 4. [Little Green Light](https://www.capterra.ch/software/123954/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) 5. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.ch/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (100 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Customer service is great--Anthony Torres is amazing." — 4.0/5 > **Bashar** | *6. April 2018* | Staatsverwaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's ease of use--very straightforward. I like the tasks and workflow features--they are very useful internally and make eliminate all the paper between departments. Tracking it and the time it's in a department is great too. > > **Nachteile**: Scheduling reports takes too long. I think "simple tasks" should actually be simple. The scheduled report feature should be easier and all report should be camped under one or two folders in the eCivis documents section. There's no point is seeing a thousand different folders for various reports, as long as dates of reports are maintained. For example, we only need 1 folder for Progress Reports and 1 folder for FFRs. > > Stay organized and on track with inter departmental tasks. Keeps documents in one place and easy to find. ----- ### "Grant Writers Resource" — 5.0/5 > **Linda Burke** | *18. April 2019* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: eCIVIS allows me to search for grants that are beyond the usual local foundations with which we partner. We actually have found a few new grantors, who share our commitment to persons living with Down syndrome and were willing to give us a grant. The format provides easy access to information about specific grant opportunities. Within just a few minutes, it is possible to determine if our organization is eligible to apply for a grant. The inclusion of grant guidelines tells me if this is an opportunity we should pursue. The selection of grants presented gives me a good idea of the trends among grantmakers. Using eCIVIS is always a positive experience. > > **Nachteile**: The only negative is that eCIVIS lists just a few grant opportunities relevant to our organization. Just kidding, of course. What grant writer wouldn't like a huge list of grant possibilities specific to their cause? > > In my opinion, eCIVIS , rather than solving business problems, presents our non-profit with opportunities to find additional funds to continue to provide high quality services which help individuals with Down syndrome become as independent as possible. ----- ### "Grants Network" — 3.0/5 > **Eric** | *13. November 2014* > > Overall a good deal of customization would be required to add significant value to the process wherein grants are currently being centrally tracked. Still, eCivis adds a friendly windows format and a means for different departments to access their grants. The "Grant" and "Project" concepts theoretically mirror the County's, but there seem to be a number of mis-matches, i.e., fields that might belong in Projects are in Grants, and vice-versa. Certain fields that exist, such as defining the total amount available, do not seem to be as relevant, as other potentially useful fields which are not captured at all (e.g. Commissioners Court dates, FTEs, ability to track award budgets at the object level, among others) The grant library does not seem to be updated with many of the grants that the County applies for, and the process of adding them to the Library is time-consuming and eCivis seems to rely on the County to document this. Search fields are not matched well to the County's specific needs: for example, there are two fields for Health -- Prevention, and Research. The County's need is mostly Public Health, and there is no field for that. Further, it would be helpful to have sub-fields within broad categories such as Public Health (Epidemiology, Family Planning, HIV-AIDS, WIC, etc). eCivis features a tool to send emails periodically on new grant opportunities, not unlike tools already in use such as grants.gov. The tool allows for some customization, but many of the hits that come back are extraneous. Still, this has been the most popular feature of eCivis to date. I've kept this fairly short, but where many of the features could be critiqued, the overall comment is that eCivis is not a bad system, and could be a good system for less complicated jurisdictions. Short of that, a good deal of customization would need to be added, or the grant tracking module significantly revamped to address more than basic needs. ----- ### "I use it everyday multiple times for different reasons." — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *5. April 2018* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The different features of grants management. I like having that in the same place as I do my grant searches. Also, I like the ability to email solicitations directly to staff and mail groups. > > **Nachteile**: None at this time. I have never had an issue with it and use it every day. None of the other users in the district have mentioned any issues with it either. ----- ### "Comprehensive, user-friendly government and national agency grant-seeking software." — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *5. April 2018* > > **Vorteile**: Very comprehensive for government and national-level grant opportunities. Very easy to use and quick to learn. Great resource for continued learning, with webinars, manuals, documents, and more\! > > **Nachteile**: Strong focus on government and national opportunities, without many local/regional options. Layout/platform can feel a bit institutional/mundane. More colors would be nice\! ----- Seite: 1 / 7\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/122493/grants-network?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/122493/grants-network) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten