--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Modern Requirements4DevOps zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Modern Requirements4DevOps Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Modern Requirements4DevOps](/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) # Modern Requirements4DevOps Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) > Als Microsoft-Partner für das Anforderungsmanagement seit 2015 schließen diese Tools die Lücken im Anforderungsmanagement in Azure DevOps. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 30 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Modern Requirements4DevOps? Das Tool eignet sich für jedes Team, das eine Single Source of Truth für seine Anforderungen, Testfälle und Codes benötigt. Verwendet von BAs, PMs, SAs und anderen in kleinen, mittleren und großen Unternehmen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 30 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Modern Requirements - **Region**: Richmond Hill, Kanada - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belgien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Frankreich, Indien, Irland, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Schweden, Schweiz, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Priorisierung - Veränderungsmanagement - Workflow-Management ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Azure DevOps Server ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.ch/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3720 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15494 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Didn't expect a template change to be this painless" — 5.0/5 > **Trivenee** | *14. September 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We had a naming convention change that hit every project template at once. Honestly the Meta Template Designer in Modern Requirements4DevOps caught me off guard, I updated the saved template once and it pushed across every Smart Doc using it. > > **Nachteile**: Figuring out which changes cascade automatically versus which need manual updates per document took some early trial and error. > > Before this, a naming change meant editing templates across a dozen active projects by hand, one at a time. The Meta Template Designer turned a half-day task into a few minutes, and honestly I didn't expect to feel this relieved over a template update. ----- ### "Side-by-side Word compare showed us exactly what changed" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *4. September 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The side-by-side Word document comparison in Modern Requirements4DevOps genuinely impressed me. Seeing every version of a document lined up together, with changes clearly visible, replaced what used to be a painful manual read through every single revision our stakeholders sent back. > > **Nachteile**: On documents with a lot of revisions, the comparison view can feel slightly crowded at first glance, making it a little harder to quickly identify the most important changes. > > I genuinely didn't expect document comparison to save this much time. It's become the first thing I open whenever a stakeholder sends feedback now, and it's caught changes I would've honestly skimmed right past before. ----- ### "Made audits feel almost painless, which is rare" — 5.0/5 > **Pallavi** | *3. August 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I was genuinely impressed by how Modern Requirements4DevOps's Impact Analysis timestamps every single change. Our last audit was the smoothest one we've had, no scrambling for evidence. > > **Nachteile**: Copilot4DevOps still needs a lot of hand-holding for anything technical. It's a nice starting point but I always end up rewriting most of what it drafts. > > We needed a clean audit trail without maintaining a separate spreadsheet. The traceability matrix inside Modern Requirements4DevOps now does that automatically, and it's honestly been a relief. ----- ### "Variant management kept our product line requirements sane" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *21. September 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We ship the same core product with regional variations, and requirements used to fork into a mess of copies. Variant management inside Modern Requirements4DevOps lets us track differences without duplicating the whole document per region. > > **Nachteile**: Understanding how variant inheritance worked initially took longer than expected, especially with three overlapping regional differences involved. > > Before this, keeping regional requirement copies in sync was a quiet dread every release. Variant management genuinely fixed that, and I no longer worry about one region's document silently drifting out of alignment with the others. ----- ### "ADO Context Menu quick actions cut so many clicks" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *5. September 2026* | Medizinische Geräte | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Right-clicking a work item and launching Smart Edit, adding it to a baseline, or starting a trace matrix straight from the ADO context menu genuinely impressed me. I didn't expect this small addition to save as many clicks as it actually did > > **Nachteile**: A few of the menu options weren't obvious until someone on our team pointed them out. At first glance, the interface seemed simple enough, but several useful features were tucked away in places we wouldn't have thought to check. > > I honestly didn't think a right-click menu would be something I'd genuinely appreciate this much. It's quietly become part of how I navigate every single work item now, without ever needing to open a separate module. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten