--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Modern Requirements4DevOps zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Modern Requirements4DevOps Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Modern Requirements4DevOps](/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) # Modern Requirements4DevOps Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) > Als Microsoft-Partner für das Anforderungsmanagement seit 2015 schließen diese Tools die Lücken im Anforderungsmanagement in Azure DevOps. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 6 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Modern Requirements4DevOps? Das Tool eignet sich für jedes Team, das eine Single Source of Truth für seine Anforderungen, Testfälle und Codes benötigt. Verwendet von BAs, PMs, SAs und anderen in kleinen, mittleren und großen Unternehmen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 6 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Modern Requirements - **Region**: Richmond Hill, Kanada - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Frankreich, Indien, Irland, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Priorisierung - Veränderungsmanagement - Workflow-Management ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Azure DevOps Server ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 3. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.ch/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3680 reviews) 4. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Best Requirements Management Tool Within AzureDevOps" — 5.0/5 > **Devang** | *11. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I love how Modern Requirement4DevOps allows us to manage requirements within our Azure DevOps tenant. It offers end-to-end traceability, review management, version control features that is very helpful for my team. > > **Nachteile**: There is no cons, but I have a suggestion that, like, I want execution agents in a Modern Requirement4DevOps. There is no cons, but I have a suggestion that, like, I want execution agency in a more than requirement for DevOps. > > Overall, it helps us a lot for requirements management and it is better than Jama Connect and Visure solutions. ----- ### "Brings Teams together & makes managing requirements in ADO easier" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *5. Mai 2026* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The best thing about Modern Requirements is that is makes teamwork easier by keeping all requirements and documents in one place > > **Nachteile**: Some of the advanced features take some time to get used to. The tool has a lot of depth and could feel overwhelming at first. > > Experience has been positive. It has helped bringing requirements, traceability, documentation in one place which in turn is helping manage projects much smoother. Collaboration across teams has improved and integration with ADO has been easy. ----- ### "Two hearts beat in my chest" — 4.0/5 > **Michael** | *8. März 2023* | Medizinische Geräte | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It integrates seamlessly into the DevOps server and it it a great extension of the DevOps server, by providing critical functionality, which is missing in the DevOps server. That is why I like the tool very much. > > **Nachteile**: The quality of the tool is not as good as it should be. We regularly experience technical issues in individual browsers. That's why every user has three different browsers on his PC. Another issue is editing of text. It is sometimes really difficult to format text the way you want or to fix formatting errors. Drag \& drop of text from other applications sometimes also has disastrous effects. That's why I (and all my colleagues) are annoyed with the tool. ----- ### "A top selection for Requirements Management for ADO-native companies" — 5.0/5 > **Vijay** | *5. Mai 2026* | Rundfunkmedien | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easily, their product support. For the specific use that we had, (that we were onboarding Azure DevOps), I don't think there is another native software available. Its also easy to manage requirements between team members, and setting up workflows. > > **Nachteile**: Nothing in particular. We've tested out various cases within the system, and the product team has always been helpful with helping us get to our specific requirements. > > Robust product to use, and a great team to work with. They met what we needed from a Requirements Management standpoint, and being native to DevOps was a critical win for us. ----- ### "good azure project manager" — 4.0/5 > **Anonymer Nutzer** | *20. November 2024* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: one stop solution to handle multiple azure based project. > > **Nachteile**: only can be used for azure. creating a custom workflow is difficult. > > it is very helpful to handle many project at azure. maintaining documents for each project is easy. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten