Wir helfen Unternehmen in der Schweiz
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl
Keeper Security
Was ist Keeper Security?
Millionen von Menschen und Tausende von Unternehmen hängen vom Passwort-Manager und digitalen Tresor von Keeper ab, um das Risiko von Datenschutzverletzungen zu reduzieren. Es ist das weltweit führende Unternehmen, um Passwörter, Dokumente und sensible digitale Assets zu sichern. Keeper arbeitet nahtlos über alle mobilen Geräte und Computer.
Wer verwendet Keeper Security?
Wir haben Kunden von kleinen und mittleren bis hin zu Kleinstunternehmen. Wir bieten den Schutz der digitalen Assets von Unternehmen, indem wir eine starke Passwort-Sicherheit durchsetzen, seien es das IT-Team oder alle Mitarbeiter im gesamten Unternehmen.
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Keeper Security das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Keeper Security
Weitere gute Alternativen zu Keeper Security
Bewertungen über Keeper Security
Good value with accessible knowledgeable support
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Great value
Vorteile:
A huge security benefit, which we didn't see at the competitor we used before - upon login the 2FA code is asked first, before the password. So brute force attacks are completely useless that way.
Nachteile:
There are some quirks, but they are not critical. Just inconveniences - for example the Android app doesn't match passwords by subdomain (just by main domain), which works in the desktop browser extension. So for projects/clients that have a lot of apps/tools on the same domain, but different subdomains, the filling function becomes useless.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
I've used many credential managers and KEEPER is THE ONE!
Kommentare: Keeper security is one of the best Credential management platforms out there, I wish I have come across is sooner. It has remedied the issue of handling, sorting/organizing , sharing credentials for our organization.
Vorteile:
The multi-platform/browser integrations are great and being able to configure Time-Based One-time passwords for each site and not having to need another authenticator app lastly the ability to easily set up shared passwords are all huge pluses that many other platforms do not offer. In addition to all the other types of records that can be stored. Forgot to mention, Breachwatch is a great reminder to harden your creds.
Nachteile:
The only con I have with Keeper is not having the option to have easy access to the Time-Based One-time codes on the main menu of the Android app in contrast to the IOS version. They are still accessible, you just need to search for the credential first to access that option.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Chrome Password and Autofill was much more useful.
Kommentare: It wasn't useful for our team.
Vorteile:
It seems secure and easy to login. Passwords can be named for easier identification.
Nachteile:
It almost never automatically fills out forms. Sporadically fails to offer password login. We are now moving to the Microsoft password management with single login.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Most Valuable Password Manager + PAM
Kommentare: By combining password management and privileged account management, we are now able to have our IT groups not errantly stored privileged accounts in their personal password vaults. We also leveraged the connection manager and are finally getting away from old school "jump boxes"
Vorteile:
Keeper's password manager and browser plug-in was favored by our end user pilot test group and by IT as easy to use. Admins loved the policy control and integration with Okta for SSO and MFA. We believe combining password management and privileged account managed into a single user interface removed a significant barrier to adoption. Previous PAM solution was a separate tool. Cost of Keeper was mid-tier compared to other popular choices, but they were willing to negotiate to win the business.
Nachteile:
Windows service account and scheduled task discovery is a missing piece of PAM we hope to see in the future. Compliance Manager features should be included in the product without having the pay extra.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Password management made easy
Kommentare: I really like Keeper. I use it daily. I really like that they give you a free family license when you have a corporate license. I have started using Keeper with the personal license for my personal passwords as well. I would definitely recommend Keeper for the combination of features, support, and price point.
Vorteile:
There are different records types so you can store all sorts of sensitive information, not just usernames and passwords. We used this to store encryption keys, secrets, etc. The software is very easy to use and easy to search. You can share the passwords individually or at a shared folder level. There is a one-time share feature that makes it easy to share passwords with contractors or external vendors who do not have a Keeper license.
Nachteile:
There have been many improvements made since we started using the product. I wish there were a little more ways to organize passwords when you share them on an individual level. When you share a single record that's in a folder, the person you share it with cannot see the folder so they end up seeing all the passwords in a flat view. I wish they could see the folder structure it was in and only the passwords they have access to. The search feature makes up for this a bit because it works very well.
