--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über ReqView zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Ein einfaches und leistungsstarkes Tool zur Erfassung und Verwaltung von Anforderungen, mit dem du die Rückverfolgbarkeit analysieren und offline mit anderen zusammenarbeiten kannst. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 49 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet ReqView? ReqView ist die Lösung für Unternehmen aus den Bereichen Medizin, Luft- und Raumfahrt und Verteidigung, Automobil usw., die Industriestandards einhalten müssen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 49 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Eccam - **Gegründet**: 2004 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: EUR 430.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Indien, Japan, Kanada, Mexiko, Tschechien, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Compliance Management - Priorisierung - Veränderungsmanagement ## Integrationen (11 insgesamt) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [IT-Management-Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.ch/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.ch/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *12. Dezember 2024* | Luft- & Raumfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **Nachteile**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25. August 2025* | Design | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Nachteile**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7. August 2025* | Luft- & Raumfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Nachteile**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5. März 2026* | Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Nachteile**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *4. November 2022* | Eisenbahnbau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **Nachteile**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten