Wir helfen Unternehmen in der Schweiz
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Was ist BlackBerry CylancePROTECT?

Höre auf, Angriffe nur zu erkennen, sondern verhindere sie, indem du CylancePROTECT verwendest, die Endpunktlösung, die 99 % der Bedrohungen in Echtzeit blockiert.

Wer verwendet BlackBerry CylancePROTECT?

Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT Software - 1
BlackBerry CylancePROTECT Software - 2

Du bist nicht sicher, ob BlackBerry CylancePROTECT das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

4.6 (64)
$ 5.99
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
22
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4.5 (64)
4.5 (64)
4.4 (64)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
6
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4.2 (74)
4.0 (74)
4.0 (74)

Weitere gute Alternativen zu BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Trend Micro Smart Protection Complete Suite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Spam-Erkennung
Threat Response
Zulassungs-/Blockierliste
Trellix Endpoint Security
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anwendungssicherheit
Echtzeitüberwachung
Gerätemanagement
Trend Micro Deep Security
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Avast Premium Business Security
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
E-Mail-Anhang Schutz
Threat Response
Bitdefender GravityZone
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Datensicherheit
Netzwerksicherheit
Threat Response
Falcon
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anomalie- / Malware-Erkennung
Echtzeitüberwachung
Schwachstellen-Scannen
Symantec Endpoint Security
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anti-Virus
Anwendungssicherheit
Störfallmanagement
Malwarebytes for Business
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Anti-Virus
Echtzeitüberwachung
Threat Response
DNSFilter
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aktivitätsüberwachung
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Threat Response

Bewertungen über BlackBerry CylancePROTECT

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4.6
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4.5
Kundenservice
4.4
Funktionen
4.5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4.5

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1’000
  • >1’001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
73%
4
16%
3
9%
1
2%
Brian
Brian
IT Manager in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bau, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ignore the marketing hype, for endpoint protection this is the real deal

5.0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I have a significant number of users out in the field with limited or no edge protection, so a cloud based endpoint solution is an obvious first step. With a traditional AV client that includes web filtering, which we also have, I would consider those endpoints EXTREMELY vulnerable. Even with excellent email filtering, which we also have, there are just too many things that can go horribly wrong. With three years experience and NO compromised endpoints, I can focus on other security layers instead of faffing around fixing endpoints.

Vorteile:

In the three years we've been protecting our endpoints with CylancePROTECT, we have had ZERO incidents across ~250 endpoints. I have tested the Cylance client against true zero day attacks, not recognized on VirusTotal, shared with me by an MSP friend. He has had many clients compromised by ransomware, several more than once, with nuke/pave/restore for the entire organization being the typical response. When I throw attacks against old-build agents, and those attacks are obliterated, it helps me sleep better at night. I don't see these attacks in my environment, hence the testing. The endpoint is the focus of the last line of defense, so PROTECT is critical in my security posture.

Nachteile:

In comparison to traditional signature-based (useless) AV, CylancePROTECT and CylanceOPTICS seems expensive. That's why my MSP pal doesn't have his SMB clients on this product, they can't comprehend the value proposition of something so different to what they're familiar with. I guess that's why the marketing initiatives can seem a little over the top, it's hard to get the idea across when some hater says "doesn't detect EICAR!"

Simha
Senior Information Security Specialist in Kanada
Finanzdienstleistungen, 5’001–10’000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Script Blocking and Machine Learning is CylancePROTECT's Strength

4.0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Very pleased.

Vorteile:

Easy to deploy and manage policies across 1000s of assets in the corporate network. Has coverage for various OS platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. Can perform bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat. Whitelist or exclusion is easy to setup. A user friendly console for reporting and oversight dashboard for threat trends and malware families.

Nachteile:

Some times results in false positive for the script module and could get tricky to manage exceptions if one is not fully aware of the gaps they can introduce by simply whitelisting system paths where most malware run. Could include real-time sandbox capabilities like other competing products in the market

Brendan
Technology Manager in USA
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

CylanceProtect was great. Blackberry Protect? Not so much.

3.0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

CylanceProtect was by all accounts, the best endpoint protection on the market. It provided outstanding protection for all our Windows and Mac endpoints.

Nachteile:

Since Blackberry bought them in 2019, the "merging" of the two companies has been clumsy. The Cylance website dashboard was clean and somewhat easy to use. The Blackberry website looks like it was designed by someone who still uses a Blackberry mobile phone. Mac OS Big Sur is being released this week, and the endpoint client for it (that really should have been released with Catalina) is still not available. False positives for Adobe CS updates seem endless. I'll be looking at alternative options when our licensing expires next summer.

Chris
IT Services Manager in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

This product will save your backside!

5.0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Extremely positive. We recommend using a MSSP to help manage the product (EDR service) for best protection.

Vorteile:

Very easy to deploy the application to endpoints, cloud management is easy to use and mange deployment. The product is very configurable to customize to your needs. Malware detection and removal is outstanding.

Nachteile:

Trying to configure the policies on your own can be a challenge, be sure to acquire the product from a MSSP to ensure you set it up right and have ongoing support.

Chris
IT Director in USA
Buchhaltung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great protection and effective

5.0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I am very pleased and this software seems to work great. I do wish there were some more EDR capabilities with this software however.

Vorteile:

With Cylance I feel that my organization is safely protected against all threats and we have never had an issue in three plus years using this. It is very easy to install and has a very small footprint which makes it nice for our PCs.

Nachteile:

Creating policies and exclusions is a bit clunky but once you figure it out it's okay. It can also have many false positives which are easily maintained through the portal.