--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über ValueOps zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ValueOps Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Team-Kommunikation Software](/directory/31033/team-communication/software) > [ValueOps](/software/177580/ca-flowdock) # ValueOps Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/177580/ca-flowdock Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/177580/ca-flowdock?page=2) > Kommunikationstool, das Teamkollegen über einen Remote-Chat verbindet, der nach Themen, Orten und Zeitzonen sortiert werden kann. > > Bewertung: **4.0/5** von 24 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet ValueOps? Für Teams jeder Größe. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.0/5** | 24 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Broadcom - **Gegründet**: 1986 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 3.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Englisch, Japanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - @mentions - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Chat / Messaging - Content-Management - Discussions/Forums - Suchen / filtern - Videokonferenzen - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Integrationen (34 insgesamt) - Airbrake - AppSignal - Asana - Assembla - Basecamp - Beanstalk - Bitbucket - BugSnag - CircleCI - Confluence - Datadog - GitHub - Highrise - Jira - Librato ... und 19 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Team-Kommunikation Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31033/team-communication/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Team-Kommunikation Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.ch/software/168668/microsoft-teams) — 4.5/5 (10941 reviews) 2. [Slack](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24046 reviews) 3. [WhatsApp](https://www.capterra.ch/software/180345/whatsapp) — 4.7/5 (16298 reviews) 4. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.ch/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5060 reviews) 5. [Telegram](https://www.capterra.ch/software/180347/telegram) — 4.7/5 (6406 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "next level chat tool" — 5.0/5 > **Art** | *13. Februar 2021* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like the way how Flowdock connects the team chats with external alerts that can be setup easily in the app. > > **Nachteile**: it doesn't look as friendly as in slack, but again - way better than teams ;-) also the mobile app is slow sometimes. > > we use to have internal team chats + extra alerting from 3rd party services. ----- ### "The best Slack alternative out there" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Dezember 2022* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Flows were invented in this app basicallyVery lightweight design, nothing distractingQuite fast > > **Nachteile**: Native mobile apps always had some sort of delay with notificationsNative mobile apps weren't as good designed as desktop ----- ### "The Diet Soda of Communication Apps" — 3.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *8. November 2018* | Medienproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like the ability to sync the software with Amazon S3 to keep an archive of all conversations/files. The desktop/browser version of the product is useful and dependable. > > **Nachteile**: The mobile app experience is really quite painful. > > It's a fine option for certain companies I'm sure. I mean when mandated it's a useful communication platform where people can get work done and build relationships. I just have had a horrible mobile experience. From receiving notifications about new messages that when I go to read causes the app to freeze and crash, to being told while in the app there's a new app update and then not finding a new mobile update in my mobile app store. It's frustrating how the browser platform works well enough for me to want to consider the mobile app version, but then the mobile version makes me want to leave the software completely. ----- ### "Good IM but needs a little more to compete with other IM alternatives" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *29. Januar 2019* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The threading system in flowdock is very intuitive, the thread replies are not hidden within the general chat, but instead they are color coded, so you can quickly identify what/who you are replying to, and at the same time, your reply is visible to everyone in the chat, not only to the people in the thread, which promotes communication between every contact in the chat. There is also an option to add hashtags to the messages, that is very useful when you have to search for specific things in the chat history. > > **Nachteile**: A lot of functionality in flowdock comes in the form of an integration, you have to add plugins in order to do other things, like screen sharing, that could be already in the tool, like its competitors do. > > Very good IM option, user friendly, promotes communication, just needs to include more functionality out of the box. ----- ### "Nice way to collaborate" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Dezember 2019* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is pretty nice in terms of threading conversations and keeping multiple conversations separate so people can read an entire conversation together. > > **Nachteile**: When someone screws up and doesn’t people thread they are the only one who can fix it, but only if they do it right away. > > Overall pretty good at what it does. Allows conversations to happen where the whole team can see and interact with them. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/177580/ca-flowdock?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/177580/ca-flowdock) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten