--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über LaunchDarkly zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LaunchDarkly Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [ ALM Tools](/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) > [LaunchDarkly](/software/187546/launchdarkly) # LaunchDarkly Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/187546/launchdarkly Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/187546/launchdarkly?page=2) > Schnell liefern. Ruhig schlafen. LaunchDarkly. Stelle sie bereit, wann du willst, mach eine Freigabe, wenn du bereit bist, erhalte die Kontrolle über deinen Code und reduziere Risiken. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 26 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet LaunchDarkly? Mit LaunchDarkly können alle Teams jeder Größe ihre Software bereitstellen und steuern. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 26 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: LaunchDarkly - **Region**: Oakland, USA ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 12.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belgien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Frankreich, Griechenland, Indonesien, Irland, Island, Isle of Man, Israel, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Luxemburg, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Philippinen und 14 weitere ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Anforderungsmanagement - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Datenvisualisierung - Kontinuierliche Bereitstellung - Kontinuierliche Lieferung - Lifecycle-Management - Qualitätssicherung - Release-Management - Ressourcenmanagement - Split-Tests - Statistische Analyse - Test-Management - Third-Party Integrations - Veränderungsmanagement - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zielgruppen-Targeting - Überwachung ## Integrationen (13 insgesamt) - AppDynamics - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Datadog - GitHub - GitLab - Jira - Pendo - Pendo - Rollbar - Segment - Slack - Terraform ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [ ALM Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [ ALM Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [DevOps Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31120/devops/software) - [PLM-Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [Programmiersoftware & Entwicklertools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [A/B Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30896/ab-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.ch/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6198 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15457 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.ch/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1224 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.ch/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1347 reviews) 5. [Google Cloud](https://www.capterra.ch/software/170983/google-cloud-platform) — 4.7/5 (2320 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Powerful, reliable feature management — worth it once you're past a certain scale" — 5.0/5 > **Soumya** | *6. Juli 2026* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - Progressive rollouts and targeting are excellent — percentage rollouts, user/segment targeting, and rule-based rules are flexible and easy to reason about. - Instant kill switch. Being able to disable a feature in seconds during an incident is the single most valuable capability. - Reliable SDKs across most major languages, with local streaming/caching so flag evaluation stays fast and doesn't add latency to the request path. - Good audit trail and history — you can see who changed what and when, which matters for change management and compliance. - Clean UI for managing flags and environments; onboarding new engineers is straightforward. > > **Nachteile**: - Pricing is steep, especially as seats and monthly context/MAU counts grow. Smaller teams may find it hard to justify versus open-source or cheaper alternatives. ----- ### "LaunchDarkly is a Feature Flag must Agile projects." — 5.0/5 > **Jeff** | *5. Januar 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: LaunchDarkly is a great tool to manage the feature flags in your source code. We have used it to manage the different parts of our SAAS product. It is very simple \[sensitive content hidden\] manage the actual feature flags and you can manage it to an environment like Dev/Test/Prod with different criteria. With the simple to use interface our Product management team is able to manage the feature flags and manage the rollout of the feature. The UI has full auditing and control for the management of the flags. > > **Nachteile**: As with any code based feature flags at some point the code is now released and you have to determine if you will take the feature flag calls to LaunchDarkly when fully released. > > The support has been good and the team that assisted us in our setup was very helpful. We have been very happy with the results and are increasing our use of the product. ----- ### "Launchdarkly is convenient for feature flagging" — 4.0/5 > **Joseph** | *15. Oktober 2024* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: A convenient way to organize feature flagging for your applications. > > **Nachteile**: No particular cons stand out to me. It works the way it should. > > Convenient and straightforward to integrate into a react-native environment for feature flagging. Allows us to keep dev work flowing and integrated while getting ready for launch. ----- ### "Flexible feature gating that scales from simple rollouts to LLM A/B testing" — 5.0/5 > **Manish** | *22. Juni 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The core flag system is solid and reliable for standard feature rollouts. It gates new code paths, can be used for gradual percentage rollouts, and killing something quickly in prod without a redeploy. Contexts and segments are where it gets genuinely useful. For our LLM A/B tests, being able to define contexts and target specific segments meant we could route different user groups to different models cleanly, without hardcoding that logic ourselves. And since adjusting targeting rules or changing the split is a config change rather than a deploy, it's quick to iterate on model behaviour and get fast feedback. > > **Nachteile**: You have to make the code changes yourself — putting the flags into the code and wiring up the logic to read them isn't something the platform does for you. On top of that, flags need regular cleanup and archiving, so there's an ongoing maintenance overhead to keep things from piling up. The targeting setup also has a bit of a learning curve before the segment and context model clicks. > > I've been using LaunchDarkly across a couple of different use cases, and it's held up well. The combination of flags, segments, and contexts is what earned it a place in our stack. It covers both straightforward feature gating and more involved experimentation from the same place. We could gate a particular code path or feature behind a flag and just as easily enable it for a segment of users, specific users, specific tenant accounts, or dedicated QA accounts. We also used it to A/B test different LLMs routing requests to different models in specific proportions and even scope that down to only specific tenants. Once the targeting model clicks, it's flexible enough to handle whatever we throw at it. For both code rollouts and LLM experimentation, it's done exactly what we needed from a single place, and I'd recommend it to any team that needs that combination. ----- ### "LaunchDarkly Review" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. Dezember 2024* | Programmentwicklung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I think the way to change the feature flags is pretty easy > > **Nachteile**: I think the pricing could improve for small companies > > LaunchDarkly has been a great tool for feature flagging and experimentation. It allows us to roll out features gradually, reducing risk and improving flexibility ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/187546/launchdarkly?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/187546/launchdarkly) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten