--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Condens zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Condens Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Qualitative Datenanalyse Software](/directory/31297/qualitative-data-analysis/software) > [Condens](/software/217476/condens) # Condens Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/217476/condens Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/217476/condens?page=2) > Condens ist eine Software zur Vereinfachung und Beschleunigung von Speichern, Analysieren und Teilen von UX-Forschungsdaten. > > Bewertung: **5.0/5** von 7 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Condens? UX-Forscher, Produktmanager, UX-Designer, and Unternehmen, die qualitative Daten analysieren. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **5.0/5** | 7 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 5.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 100% | (10/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Condens Insights ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: EUR 15.00 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 209 weitere ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Daten-Import / -Export - Datenvisualisierung - Forschung mit gemischten Methoden - Textanalyse - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Integrationen (11 insgesamt) - FigJam - Google Drive - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Teams - Miro - Mural - OneDrive - Slack - User Interviews - UserTesting - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Qualitative Datenanalyse Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31297/qualitative-data-analysis/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Delve](https://www.capterra.ch/software/196428/delve) — 4.9/5 (190 reviews) 2. [ATLAS.ti](https://www.capterra.ch/software/171500/atlas-ti) — 4.7/5 (142 reviews) 3. [MAXQDA](https://www.capterra.ch/software/174104/maxqda) — 4.8/5 (24 reviews) 4. [Tableau](https://www.capterra.ch/software/77260/tableau) — 4.6/5 (2348 reviews) 5. [XLSTAT](https://www.capterra.ch/software/119448/xlstat) — 4.7/5 (398 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Very happy we are using Condens\!" — 5.0/5 > **Emma** | *17. November 2023* | Versicherung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Condens does not feel feature-bloated like some other research repository tools. Overall it's pretty intuitive and building reports and putting data synthesis together happens quickly. It's easy to pull data from different projects and include it in a single artifact. Setup was easy and smooth, and the team is communicative, helpful, and kind. The cost fit much more in line with what our small team can handle, and they took our requirements for privacy and security very seriously. > > **Nachteile**: I am still adjusting to the UI a bit. Our team is coming from a different, more expensive research repository tool that was much brighter and colorful – a bit more modern, visually. Once we saw what Condens could do for us, it was worth moving away from 'pretty' to get 'useful'. > > Love it. Really happy with the people from Condens that I have interacted with. Feedback is taken seriously – the \[sensitive content hidden\] even directly addressed a small bug I found. It feels good working with a tool that has people on the other side of it. ----- ### "Must Have for User Interviews" — 5.0/5 > **My Linh** | *19. August 2024* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Intuitive interface, regular updates and further developments, helpful capabilities to streamline evaluation of qualitative data. Best of all: Being able to share quotes and insights with stakeholders in an interesting way. > > **Nachteile**: Faulty automatic transcription - still better than transcription capabilities from MS Teams though. Cumbersome to maintain and manage for agencies with different clients: The workspaces are great, but difficult to manage consistently. > > We introduced Condens 9 months ago and everyone is really happy with this tool. We mainly use it to analyze data from user sessions and notice how much more efficient (and fun) our work is. ----- ### "Intuitive workflow for UX research" — 5.0/5 > **Will** | *23. August 2024* | E-Learning | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: ease of use, layout, interface, customizability, integration into a standard research workflow, excellent report generation > > **Nachteile**: I haven't really found much that I don't like. For what I need, it fits into my workflow pretty perfectly > > I've been using Condens for a few weeks now and am really impressed with how well-thought out it is. Most actions are completely intuitive in terms of coding. When I've been in doubt, before I check the user manual (which is also excellently written), I just try what I think would work and so far I have not been disappointed in that working. I've yet to deliver a report with Condens yet, but I have been playing with building one out, and I think it will fit perfectly into how my team works. I look forward to getting to know the tool more fully. ----- ### "A game changer for qualitative UX research" — 5.0/5 > **Gabriel** | *24. August 2023* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Condens was truly a game changer for our in-house UX team, allowing us a central location to collaborate on qualitative research that is not only functional but also a joy to use. Automated transcripts tied to the actual videos of our interview sessions that we can easily search, tag and filter makes it incredibly easy to collaboratively identify important themes and to pull quotes and video highlights to incorporate into presentations for stakeholders. On top of all this, the Condens interface is clean and beautiful and has made research a lot more fun. > > **Nachteile**: The main thing that I would love to see is more functionality dedicated to creating sleek video highlights reels of feedback from users (these videos are super valuable for persuading stakeholders). While I definitely don't expect Condens to become a full video editing program, some simple editing features would be very valuable. For example, I would love to be able to easily adjust the portion of a tagged quote that makes it into a video highlights reel (without having to work around by creating new tags). It'd also be super helpful to be able to crop the video (for example to show just the participant and exclude the interviewer from the image). Bonus would be to able to add some basic text overlays or at least a title screen to describe the video. Essentially, I would love to take advantage of the link between text transcripts and session videos to quickly make sleeker highlights videos than what is possible now in Condens without having to export and work in another piece of software like Premiere. In fact, the ability to quickly amass video clips from highlighted portions of transcripts was probably the main killer feature that drew me to Condens in the first place. > > We are using Condens to analyze our research interviews more quickly and collaboratively and to build a research repository that our UX team can refer to when designing for end users in various types of roles/personas. ----- ### "The perfect tool for qualitative analysis for UX designers." — 5.0/5 > **Petr** | *18. November 2023* | Telekommunikation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Quality of transcription and ease of use. A tool that doesn't want to do everything and does just about what we need it to do – help with the analysis of my in-depth interviews and usability tests. > > **Nachteile**: Condens does not integrate with Lookback.com – which is not their fault when Lookback does not expose an API to get the recordings. They recently dropped the per-project pricing and only have standard subscriptions. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/217476/condens?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/217476/condens) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten