--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Basecamp zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Collaboration Tools](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/56808/basecamp Seite: 1 / 578\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Weltweit vertrauen Millionen auf Basecamp - alles an einem Ort, was du brauchst, um deine Arbeit zu erledigen. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 14421 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Basecamp? Unternehmer, Freiberufler, kleine Unternehmen und Gruppen großer Organisationen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 14421 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Basecamp - **Region**: Chicago, USA - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 15.00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 207 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Aktivitäts-/Newsfeeds - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenmanagement - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Chat / Messaging - Discussions/Forums - Dokumentenmanagement - Drag-and-Drop - Echtzeit-Chat - Filesharing - Fortschrittsverfolgung - Ideenmanagement - Kalenderverwaltung - Kommentare / Notizen - Kommunikationsmanagement - Live-Chat - Meilensteinverfolgung - Mobiler Zugriff - Priorisierung - Produkt-Roadmaps - Projekt-Nachverfolgung - Projektplanung/Terminierung - Rollen-basierte Genehmigung - Sub-Task Management - Suchen / filtern - Task Editing - Termin-Fristenmanagement - Textnachrichtenversand - Third-Party Integrations - Umfragen & Feedback - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Konfiguration - Workflow-Management - Zeitverfolgung - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (93 insgesamt) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... und 78 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Task Management Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Team-Kommunikation Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools für gemeinnützige Organisationen](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativen 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.ch/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6055 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.ch/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9247 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15402 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://www.capterra.ch/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13587 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://www.capterra.ch/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23546 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Basecamp For it" — 5.0/5 > **Jesse** | *28. Januar 2025* | Medienproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Agile team and task scheduling as well as alignment. Advanced features adaptive to it performance. > > **Nachteile**: Nothing to say less, it makes it happens best. > > Qualified for team communication and overall scheduling. ----- ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *21. Mai 2026* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **Nachteile**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23. April 2026* | Rechtsberatung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Nachteile**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Basecamp 5 is a perfect failure" — 2.0/5 > **Drew** | *1. Juni 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Basecamp has been a reliable project management and client collaboration platform since the classic version, delivering consistent core functionality across message boards, to-dos, file storage, campfire chat, and schedules Flat rate Pro Unlimited pricing is genuinely competitive and predictable for teams with large numbers of client users Clients can be added to projects at no additional cost, making it cost-effective for agency and SaaS onboarding workflows The platform served as an effective personalized documentation and training center, with clients actively using every feature > > **Nachteile**: The Basecamp 5 migration has been the worst product update experience in years of use dating back to Basecamp Classic Dozens of process-breaking workflow changes shipped with no opt-out or legacy mode Admin control over participant notification settings was removed; users must now manage their own notification preferences per project individually, destroying any ability to manage this at scale across hundreds of projects Project list access, archived items, templates, lineup, and other frequently used features were buried behind search bars and nested menus with no direct navigation Support response to every reported issue has been a consistent "sorry, that's the way it is now," with no acknowledgment that the changes broke real workflows > > The Basecamp 5 update has been the worst update migration experience and I've been a user since Basecamp classic. The number of process breaking changes are so long, we stopped tracking them. Basecamp's response, across the board, to each support request has been "sorry, that's the way it is now." ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *27. März 2026* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **Nachteile**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- Seite: 1 / 578\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/56808/basecamp) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten