--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Eaglesoft zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Eaglesoft Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Zahnarzt Software](/directory/20027/dental/software) > [Eaglesoft](/software/60064/eaglesoft-13-00) # Eaglesoft Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/60064/eaglesoft-13-00 Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/60064/eaglesoft-13-00?page=2) > HIPPA-konforme On-Premise-Praxismanagementlösung, mit der medizinische Einrichtungen Patient\*innenakten, Zahlungen und mehr verwalten können. > > Bewertung: **4.1/5** von 157 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Eaglesoft? Die Anwendung wurde für medizinische Einrichtungen aller Größen entwickelt und hilft bei der Verwaltung und Verfolgung von Behandlungsplänen von Patient\*innen, Akten, ausstehenden Zahlungen und mehr. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.1/5** | 157 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Patterson Dental Supply - **Region**: St. Paul, USA ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Behandlungsplanung - Bildgebung und Röntgenstrahlung - Confirmations/Reminders - Diagramm-Erstellung - Dokumentenmanagement - Fortschritt-Notizen - HIPAA konform - Kundenmanagement - Medizinische Abrechnung - Mehrere Standorte - Reklamationsabwicklung - Terminverwaltung - Verwaltung von Patientenakten ## Integrationen (4 insgesamt) - EVAsoft Dental Image Management - Legwork - Planmeca Romexis - Weave ## Optionen für Kundensupport - FAQ/Forum - Chat ## Category - [Zahnarzt Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20027/dental/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Zahnarzt Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20027/dental/software) - [Patientenmanagement Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/30780/patient-management/software) - [Zahnmedizinische Chart Software](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/31260/dental-charting/software) ## Alternativen 1. [CareStack](https://www.capterra.ch/software/176206/carestack) — 4.8/5 (188 reviews) 2. [BestoSys](https://www.capterra.ch/software/144398/bestosys) — 4.8/5 (293 reviews) 3. [Curve Dental](https://www.capterra.ch/software/98688/curve-dental-hero) — 4.4/5 (285 reviews) 4. [Practice-Web](https://www.capterra.ch/software/48192/practice-web-dental) — 4.9/5 (115 reviews) 5. [ABELDent](https://www.capterra.ch/software/60250/abeldent) — 4.7/5 (112 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Only Software for Dental" — 5.0/5 > **Meg** | *3. März 2022* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is the best software available for general dental professionals. Everything is easy to do and there isn't anything my staff can do that I am unable to undo. The settings allow for each user to have different access to things. > > **Nachteile**: Eaglesoft is currently not cloud based. We have to have a physical server to use this software. > > It's great. We have used it for years and see no reason to switch ----- ### "Excellent Practice Management Software" — 5.0/5 > **Nancy** | *24. März 2022* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Eaglesoft offers so many features to make practice management so much easier. Their reports, charting and treatment planning are so organized. I love the insurance aging report and how you can make notes that can be tracked and filtered through the insurance outstanding claim window. This saves so much time. There are so many features to list that we love. > > **Nachteile**: I would have to say the only thing as this time I would like to see improve is to be able to print patient notes from their chart note screen instead of having to go to patient master notes. > > I have used Eaglsoft for more than 20 years. It is so user friendy and it is easy to train new team members to use. I have used other practice management software in the past and none of them are as good as Eaglesoft. ----- ### "Excellent "hub" for managing all aspects of your BUT Patterson's lack of attention to 2018 Security Standards should make it a non starter or at minimum give pause before implementing" — 3.0/5 > **Michael** | *28. März 2018* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: When it comes to managing the end-to-end operations of a practice, Eaglesoft really can be a one-stop solution for providers as well as the front office. This improves efficiency and drives value that can be realized from the software investment, but it really does require the organization to be "all in" with regards to fully implementing Eaglesoft to realize its full value > > **Nachteile**: Reporting effectively needs to be blown up and started over. While there are several out-of-box reports, there is no way to customize reporting that does not require getting Eaglesoft involved, and in many cases it goes absolutely nowhere. There are so many better reporting technologies and capabilities that enable template reports to become hundreds of other reports, and Patterson desperately needs to get a 21st century reporting capability added to the product. Eaglesoft desperately needs a new web-based UI. the 32 bit UI in 2018 is difficult, and subscribes to a user mode that is quickly becoming out dated. Watching our hygienist and doctors use the product day-in and day-out I see many areas where a new UI with a new Reporting engine would go a long long ways in rejuvenating a product that is otherwise very capable in facilitating the management of a practice > > As the Chief Security Officer and Director of IT for a mid-size dental practice, and as someone who manages Product Management for delivering enterprise security products for some of the largest organizations in the world, for all the good that Eaglesoft potentially provides to a practice, there is no way in good conscience I could / would recommend the product based on its inability, and the company's lack of desire, to address basic issues that contribute to poor security. Our practice has spend multiple thousands of dollars and increased network complexity, in order to mitigate, to our risk assessment satisfaction, and address both our HIPAA HITECH and PCI compliance obligations ariybd these basic issues. EagleSoft did take steps in version 18 to improve the security of its database and protect patent data at rest which was both commendable and expected under HIPAA HITECH. However, other basic security best practices, Patterson has demonstrated absolutely no desire or willingness to address. Prior to posting this review, I reached out to Patterson notifying them of these issues, and offering to partner with the organization to address. I was politely told "no thank you" and that "they had no intention of addressing the issues in the near future." That was in Oct 2017. The basic issues are: 1. The product forces you to have your practice users have local administrative privileges on the workstation - This runs completely counter to the "least privilege" principal of security that states that a user should have the absolute least amount of privileges required to perform a set of tasks. As a result of this requirement - we cannot sufficiently lockdown our computing environment to sufficiently address Change Management. Further, if a practice user shoul inadvertantly stumble upon something from the internet that our Symantec Endpoint protection should miss, this single issue creates a condidiotn where the malicious code can propogate across the network faster then we could contain it. That is because our staff move between 11 treatment rooms. Wev've been forced to do heavy network segmenting as a mitigation tactic so that we could contain an outbreak or other malicious code providing us sufficient time to detect and respond. There is absolutely no reason, except for lazy coding practices, that in 2018 and Windows 7 and higher platforms that Eaglesoft cannot easily adapt their Win32 UI to run without fear of error when the user is logged onto the workstation as nothing more then a local system or domain User. 2. The second security flaw is that it is predicated on an idea that all users are using a shared credential at the workstation. While I understand that this is normal behavior in historical practices, and even today in smaller practices who choose simplicity vs. other risk, the product can be and should be able to easily adapt to an environment where each practice user has their own unique network login. It is already a requirement in PCI, and expect that in future HITECH updates that multi-factor authentication, i.e. OTP will become increasingly required. This inability to cleanly address multiple user profiles results in: 2.1 Violation of security best practices because it obscures tracability of action on the network. 2.2 When each user has their own system login, Eaglesoft forces you to go in and make sure that each person is individually setup to leverage common resources like X-Rays, Oral Cameras, etc. This makes moving from room to room difficult because for less technical users it makes it impossible to seamless work in any room where they may have never worked before because configurations cannot be set at a workstation level and traverse all profiles. 2.3 Eaglesoft does not provide the ability to integrate natively with Active Directory. I can understand, and fully accept Patterson's decision for Eaglesoft itself to be its own standalone Authentication and Authorization mechanism. It makes perfect sense because Patterson does not want to have an inherent mandate that AD be a prerequisite. In small practices that would too much. However, with that said, I know for 100% sure that it is not brain surgery to equip a product with its own authentication and authorization schema to leverage AD authentication and authorization if AD is present. I've done it multiple times in multiple enterprise scale products. I would expect that it should be possible if AD is present that I should be able to map an AD account to an Eaglesoft account. Today my users have to sign on twice. Once to the workstation and then to Eaglesoft, when once would be sufficient. To be blunt, these security issues above make it very hard for those of us with an information security background we are hard pressed to not look negligent if / when a security breach occurs and someone evaluates our due diligence against established security best practices. In summary, for all of the wonderful capabilities of Eaglesoft that in many ways makes it a "must have" for our practice. But in truth, If it wasn't for the fact that it was easier and cheaper to incur the additional network complexity and operations costs then it would be to detangle the practice's operations from Eaglesoft and migrate to an alternative platform we would have replaced Eaglesoft over a year ago. ----- ### "Eaglesoft is great - not many drawbacks" — 5.0/5 > **Whitley** | *30. August 2022* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We really enjoy the ease of logging in and changing appts, and keeping patients information up to date - had great reminders and ease of use with statements etc. > > **Nachteile**: There are some glitches that will occasionally pop up, the company doesn’t ever reach out ahead of time and warn you. You usually end up finding out when you call in to find out what’s going on. Eaglesoft just like any softwares can have issues just get ahead of them and reach out before hand > > We enjoy it - helps us stay organized and keep track of patients and referrals\! Overall great company and software ----- ### "Great program in the dental world, easy to use." — 4.0/5 > **Rebecca** | *22. Mai 2023* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Love the features of sending claims and using the attachments. Check eligibilty right thru the program is easy and a must. > > **Nachteile**: The programs tends to freeze up at times and can be frustrating. > > My overall experience with Eaglesoft is great, the customer service is beyond amazing and they always answer any questions I may have. ----- Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/60064/eaglesoft-13-00?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/60064/eaglesoft-13-00) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten