--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über MicroMD zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: MicroMD Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Elektronische Patientenakte Software (ePA)](/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) > [MicroMD](/software/74016/micromd-emr) # MicroMD Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/74016/micromd-emr Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74016/micromd-emr?page=2) > Managementlösung für Arztpraxen, die Patienteninformationen, Terminplanung, integrierte EDI-Funktionen, Berichterstattungstools und mehr umfasst. > > Bewertung: **3.3/5** von 21 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet MicroMD? Henry Schein Medical Systems bedient mehr als 2.700 medizinische Praxen, Gemeindegesundheitszentren und Abrechnungsdienste. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **3.3/5** | 21 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 60% | (6/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Henry Schein One - **Region**: American Fork, USA - **Gegründet**: 1982 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 599.00 - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200 - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Code- & Gebühreneintrag - Coding-Unterstützung - Compliance-Verfolgung - Diagramm-Erstellung - Dokumentenmanagement - Drogenreferenz-Datenbank - EMR / EHR - EPCS Compliant - Elektronische Rezepte - Elektronische Vorabgenehmigung (Electronic Prior Authorization) - Entscheidungsunterstützung - Erinnerungen - Formelsammlung-Management - HIPAA konform - Inventarverwaltung - Kalenderverwaltung - Klinik-Interoperabilität - Medication Alerts/Warnings - Medication Management - Medikamenten-Historie - Medizinische Abrechnung - Medizinische Terminplanung - Mehrere Standorte - Patienten-Terminplanung - Patienteninteraktion - Patientenportal - Personalverwaltung - Prescription Renewal - Rechnungshistorie - Reklamationsabwicklung - Schadensprüfung - Self-Service Portal - Terminplanung - Terminverwaltung - Third-Party Integrations - Verwaltung von Patientenakten - Wiederkehrende Termine - Workflow-Management - Überprüfung der Versicherungsberechtigung - Überweisungsbescheid - Übungs-Management ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Elektronische Patientenakte Software (ePA)](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Elektronische Patientenakte Software (ePA)](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Kardiologie](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32561/cardiology-emr/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Hautärzte](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32518/dermatology-emr/software) - [Praxissoftware & Arztsoftware](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/20029/medical-practice-management/software) - [Elektronische Gesundheitsakten für Erstversorgung](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/32665/primary-care-ehr/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Fusion](https://www.capterra.ch/software/136876/pediatric-therapy-emr) — 4.3/5 (708 reviews) 2. [ModMed](https://www.capterra.ch/software/124590/ema) — 4.4/5 (363 reviews) 3. [Epic](https://www.capterra.ch/software/122278/epiccare-emr) — 4.4/5 (447 reviews) 4. [Tebra](https://www.capterra.ch/software/129169/tebra) — 3.9/5 (1360 reviews) 5. [Jane](https://www.capterra.ch/software/178984/jane-app) — 4.8/5 (494 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Great Medical Records Software" — 5.0/5 > **Latoria** | *12. April 2025* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I love the ease of use for medical record purposes. Information is easily accessible and organized. > > **Nachteile**: It was not widely used in other states outside of Texas where I was first introduced to it so my medical records could not be streamlined through the software from one place to another. > > My experience with micromd was that it was very useful in reviewing my medocal info after in patient visits. It was a convenient tool to have. ----- ### "Easy to Use, Lots of Flexibility" — 5.0/5 > **Garrett** | *6. Januar 2016* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: You can customize things yourself on the fly without having to call support or pay extra fees. I'm not sure what some of the negative reviewers are talking about, but I'm guessing they didn't pay attention during training. You can easily create your own templates and even separate templates for different doctors/conditions/types of visits if you want. We are a subspecialist and there were really no specific products tailored to our practice and that is why we ultimately selected this EMR because there is so much flexibility and you don't even have to use the same templates for every provider. Some of our doctors like check boxes, while others like to free text in certain areas of the encounter. You don't have to pick one or the other with this product. Also, we evaluated several EMR's before implementing MicroMD in June 2015 and we felt this was one of the easiest products to train staff on. Much less complicated than hospital-based EMR systems we considered. > > **Nachteile**: Like any EMR product I am sure, there are some quirks and added functionality you would like to see. But, as another reviewer mentioned they allow users to submit suggestions for improvements. Despite my colleague's skepticism, I can vouch that even in only a little over a year and a half that we have been using the product there have already been several upgrades that have been made with updates to new versions. One other point for practices to consider is that this is a server-based (as opposed to cloud based program), we were already running our practice management on a server through VPN's for multiple offices so we were fine with this. But something to consider if you are thinking you would like Internet based login without owning a server. ----- ### "MicroMD EHR review" — 2.0/5 > **Nicole** | *13. Februar 2017* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 1.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Support is okay they respond to request quickly. > > **Nachteile**: Cannot build flat file transfers (interfaces with other companies). Reporting is antiquated. Micro-MD does not have the ability to scrub invoices which create more work for our billing dept. We are an FQHC and have very specific billing and reporting requirements, Micro-MD has not been helpful with any of this. The PM and EMR applications are not well integrated. When we asked them about UDS reporting and flat-file transfers they informed us that they could not do that it would take to many hours of work to create these interfaces. Their solution was a new add-on they creating might be able to help but it would cost extra and still would have the information we needed at our fingertips. And no one from the company even discussed what this new software add-on would do or presented it us to see if it was something that could possibly work to resolve our issues with Micro-MD. > > This product is not user-friendly at all. The reporting systems are so antiquated and not easy to use. The reporting is not geared towards reporting outcomes for CMS (UDS reporting and meaningful use). To print reports Micro-MD requires you to use plus signs and equals signs, it is 2017. It should be a lot easier than that to print reports. Not UDS friendly, you cannot filter reports any way you want too. Micro-MD cannot build interfaces (flat-file transfers) with companies to streamline reporting and sending patient encounters to insurance companies. ----- ### "Positively affirmed of choosing MicroMD daily" — 5.0/5 > **RACHEL** | *30. Dezember 2015* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I researched and met with a variety of EHR and PM software vendors before deciding on MicroMD. This was a difficult process because I have a multi-specialty group practice, and wanted to find an application to properly support 2 specialties. I have been live on both software applications for over 3 years. The applications are very user friendly, and support is always available and helpful. The transition to ICD-10 was seamless. I have also successfully met Stage 1 and 2 of meaningful use plus successfully passed a pre-payment audit. The PM software is user friendly, and any new employees are easily trained to use it. My previous vendor was Medical Manager, and MicroMD was able to successfully transfer all of my Medical Manager data into their system. I didn't have to work on 2 systems like most practices have to do in the beginning. The PM billing applications are also user friendly. The multiple financial reports that can be generated are extremely helpful. > > **Nachteile**: Annual support and maintenance fees are costly, but I don't know how they compare to anyone else. This may be an average cost of doing business with EHR to meet government regulations. The hourly fees for training are also a little high, but due to the product's ease of use, the amount of training needed may be minimal. ----- ### "User Friendly & Customizable" — 5.0/5 > **Lynn** | *26. Dezember 2019* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Very user friendly, and the ability to customize EVERYTHING, is great. > > **Nachteile**: It tends to get a little costly, as you're charged by user. > > As a billing company, we're able to customize every practice according to their scope of practice, and provider preference. From ease of being able to break down a report to the most specific detail.... to color coding their schedules. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74016/micromd-emr?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/74016/micromd-emr) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten