--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Cradle zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Schweiz. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cradle Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Schweiz 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Cradle](/software/78756/cradle) # Cradle Canonical: https://www.capterra.ch/software/78756/cradle Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/78756/cradle?page=2) > Die komplette Anforderungsmanagementlösung für System- und verfahrenstechnische Projekte. > > Bewertung: **4.4/5** von 27 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Cradle? Jeder, der Systeme mit Funktionalität entwickelt. Typische Märkte sind Luftfahrt, die Automobilindustrie, Verteidigung, Finanzwesen, Regierung, Produktion, Nukleartechnik, Prozesssteuerung, Telekommunikation und Transport. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.4/5** | 27 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: 3SL - **Region**: Barrow-in-Furness, UK - **Gegründet**: 1987 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 449.00 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1'000, 1'001–5'000, 5'001–10'000, 10'000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Albanien, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Antigua und Barbuda, Australien, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien, Belize, Bosnien und Herzegowina, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Bulgarien, China, Deutschland, Dominica, Dänemark, Estland, Falklandinseln und 59 weitere ## Funktionen - Priorisierung - Veränderungsmanagement - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Microsoft Word ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Anforderungsmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.ch/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.ch/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.ch/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.ch/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ch/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.ch/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Customers In Mind" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *30. August 2018* | Luft- & Raumfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The developers kept the customer in mind when creating the tool. The user interface is very accommodating and easy to use. Capability to collaborate with other tools very helpful and a top requirement when choosing the right tool. The customer service is excellent\! Always available and willing to work with the customer to the needs. > > **Nachteile**: I have not run into any cons. I’m impressed with the tool. > > I’m extremely impressed with the tool. I even enjoy having the capability to work in a sandbox area for practice. Training to excellent\! ----- ### "Requirements Engineering Software - could not manage without it" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. August 2018* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Designed to manage engineering and operational requirements first. Will handle software requirements as well, but I like the fact that it uses terms recognised by civil, mechanical, electrical, marine, aerospace, automotive, nuclear engineers. Second important plus point is its graphical capability. To be able to show how a requirement links to a process or an organisation brings the whole subject of RE to life making it so much simpler to ensure users can record all their requirements and that they can verify that they have been met. > > **Nachteile**: The user interface is very traditional and is ready for a facelift. It works well for requirements engineers but is not as intuitive as would be needed for infrequent access and use by business users. > > From the initial engagement with the staff at 3SL through implementation and support we have been well supported. The few gaps we found for our particular use of have been filled as an enhancement, initially for us, but then will become part of the core product. A very responsive organisation. The flexibility of its metamodel (Schema) has allowed us to extend our use well beyond traditional Requirements Engineering. Where will Cradle take us next? ----- ### "Cradle Life" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *29. August 2018* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Modeling, Requirement Management, Click and Drag objects. Can support almost any SE task. Full SE life-cycle support capabilities. > > **Nachteile**: Performance, Web Access, Older looking, Proprietary Database, Difficult to integrate with other systems. Sometimes that amount of functionality makes it hard to remember how to use the system unless you are in it every day. > > I have been working with Cradle for the past 12 years and have not found a SE tool with Cradles functionality. Other tools do not allow you to follow the complete System Engineering Process from Modeling all the way to retirement. ----- ### "Usage and Administration of CRADLE" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *30. August 2018* | Elektrische/elektronische Fertigung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It covers almost every task you may encounter during requirements management process. If you get used to the interface it is very flexible and can easily be adopted to specific needs. The text format of the Cradle export files allows a lot of additional (specific) data processing. > > **Nachteile**: Actually I'm missing privileges to restrict link management (especially deleting a link). For people typically working with Microsoft Office application, the usage of CRADLE requires a change in mindset (but this may also be a 'Pros'). The upgrade process is really challenging for our IT. The direct connection of server and client version leads to a 1-day shutdown of CRADLE and parallel distributing of the clients to a lot of computers. The Document Publisher is really hard to use. Template definition requires a lot of effert and experiments until it is running. The publishing process is too time consuming. > > I think its a perfect tool to implement a process for requirements engineering at least to the level we are using it. (We don't do any modelling os far, also no systems engineering.) ----- ### "A very valuable and customizable RM Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. August 2018* | Öl & Energie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: CRADLE is a very mature solution, pefectly suitable for large scale requirements engineering projects. It can perfectly be adapted to any business model, process, allowing very specific customization (using an API for interface developments interacting with the tools database). Data access control can be tailored to match a projects organization, data configuration management is very precisely ensured. A wide range of file formats is proposed for interfaces with the external world (for imports, exports, or as attachments) 3SL Team offers a very good support and service when required. > > **Nachteile**: The interface of the client could be considered as a bit stark and old fashioned. (we did not worked with web interfaces) Unfortunately, only one baseline can be open at a time, validated alternatives could only be managed using distinct objects. User experience for Verification \& Validation process (using workflows) could be enhanced (reviews by validator is to be preferably done using XLS exports) Source document import using Doc Loader (Word format) can be a difficult experience for docs with complex structure, and could allow more possibilities (table patterns) ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.ch/software/78756/cradle?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.ch/software/78756/cradle) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten